Received: by 2002:a25:f815:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u21csp1577117ybd; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:51:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzMoyMCjmdyrS60mCrX50Fhk68gREAqYpfqDPZpuSq/6iRLsPshU6lCSuEmJyHPsqMfz6LG X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a607:: with SMTP id u7mr4351529plq.43.1561312316428; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:51:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561312316; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nrSrRhEUs5h5u2hm+cacXSQC3+YRBdYiV5MipdT1JufH1/mAnd6MZj69W+XUQCV4Yp VDP7doODaI7YJXISH+yhsJTyXFZf00N1O6XHTeKMvPl0SQYGjaOBKgBnlbu2Q12LV2hI B3+ZGuEbK9AX440oGJxXVJjoqTKzyM19ws/CD987nNo+YnM//va8ygw/HMFYT/5Uh3WS aKezidTzEWkQTgJMQgKs2+tF/hvMTCw0iRS6tmYdvL7vdjR5ksY88u6TZixI3SI/bYcg P3Ru9ey9vTCqj75GSQf36gvsSSFUmjZ/5EmMBTLXQXsP0PGCIDphaGCsCHXqBmudEs88 Ty0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Q2J+zKT6qsK6pe1jDDGYOH9t9wEmd7xRD0oxX/ZUOXQ=; b=nvQA9/t33DeBPORhQ3FN2FjpCiJXvcGd7qxxLsMMbaF9TPQHng86Wv8qWpwx/BNwsW /5NK0/GXP28iP/DXIqJUhLxDx8QXDGBvghV6yBtkVBr1e0S3u3Op/YhxWmGYdeZ6felF vYvsT3ANFn9sen+MQxD0rf8UslnVpnFagFhHLf2CnvmLd7en+6x1krT9U3rxFD5ybRar DkfJqsSmxOvsef18korQjHKyTM/NKERaREITAKKQpwGOLdsrusfC8lgaX7vWklzXWd4z VoDuJhhJtGYfnoMtRWe9rtcc0ra5Bin7dyhIjnqAxVGQk2U78q+zsIIc2T/qoj4O2WUy U9WA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sifive.com header.s=google header.b="mvMMAei/"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i8si9058942pfk.189.2019.06.23.10.51.40; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sifive.com header.s=google header.b="mvMMAei/"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726632AbfFWRvg (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 23 Jun 2019 13:51:36 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com ([209.85.166.66]:39857 "EHLO mail-io1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726417AbfFWRvf (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jun 2019 13:51:35 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id r185so322249iod.6 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:51:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Q2J+zKT6qsK6pe1jDDGYOH9t9wEmd7xRD0oxX/ZUOXQ=; b=mvMMAei/5azOZcypBaEq8btNPNLpZxE8KXSkooN06cOew1QavQgeymrVjqWBjat1GL uzBIDawPiu/bbiNJmLhZPmISgjP9aSiopTaL/7FR1APjAYczi+W0RvE9jR1WzBLBerqU 7u5n19EJbrps00jQxZD4b5DiKjfAR2j6nJ3QDQUWgjjIP4uU7Rl5uAh4S4a2XlFtPU/d Q/Hnk1VimSW17bTId6rZHzDJiIQT2NBzvQefxhxRpAncjpMwQ7wUhc12FxoK2tKIdDcx XjQBxcDItwoOpcj78IDtHiU5jixCisA0Fsm4m9M9YUFLtXmouM0VW0sBz9+81nwGIiVL jisg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Q2J+zKT6qsK6pe1jDDGYOH9t9wEmd7xRD0oxX/ZUOXQ=; b=T8UCAv2e421HouK3uaAUZDOQ4SxOG5FysYoRIkUSsOH22fTs3aNPZ9mEU8ft42KywX YlN9awOFcEcbnxt8QiIRgKvWo1JhSizV957LrR85hGtF8IrD4KWmo4GMjVfhwpOYpYC0 Aqqt6MaP3Af2xX/3t4mmUN/MGuuxHbzSSojxAaFX0LZhtQUo64xpQ+EoKLlmRcAdpeBd vvFT7kOwzK42quK0v/2cl4X1Y3WUeBKFPSMMICEFckaIIoC2698L5FdufybtdXqZgOBV KWEvVD+Ns467E3oHkrtCuK66Sb7lnREywdMWB0AbxPvnvg3RUxzAKqr37SIcJ5nxDs1i 9yvA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXK+cc7N8hxyetjVpLMdXDnMXlYj4nMinJj8d1wJKc0KJRrTa7o 7mfq+XW59fYNN16yYFuT1AJ4Qw== X-Received: by 2002:a02:ce52:: with SMTP id y18mr19504458jar.78.1561312294952; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-73-95-159-87.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.95.159.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5sm7607520iom.42.2019.06.23.10.51.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:51:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: Atish Patra , linux@armlinux.org.uk cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "rfontana@redhat.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "jhugo@codeaurora.org" , "aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" , "mingo@kernel.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "mchehab+samsung@kernel.org" , "Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "morten.rasmussen@arm.com" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "palmer@sifive.com" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "ottosabart@seberm.com" , "sudeep.holla@arm.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "rafael@kernel.org" , "anup@brainfault.org" , "linux@armlinux.org.uk" , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code. In-Reply-To: <91559562f2958fa904b53e621e596d6216efa9fb.camel@wdc.com> Message-ID: References: <20190617185920.29581-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20190617185920.29581-4-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20190619173801.GB20916@kroah.com> <91559562f2958fa904b53e621e596d6216efa9fb.camel@wdc.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Atish, Russell, On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Atish Patra wrote: > On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 19:38 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:59:16AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > > > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe > > > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to > > > a common place instead of duplicate code. [ ... ] > I guess Greg has acked the series assuming that it will go through some > other tree. Can you take it through RISC-V tree ? > > Sorry for the confusion. > > Note: We are still waiting for RMK's ACK on arm patch before it can be > sent as a PR. I'm fine to take it through the RISC-V tree, once Russell acks the arch/arm patch. - Paul