Received: by 2002:a25:f815:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u21csp2242960ybd; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 03:10:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw/T2rbT2sy1NVCUQO6Iw8QiNi63J+1pzOYoDaobXotoJrGpg4IPAfaziLIthHQ3vDQgvTt X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bb01:: with SMTP id u1mr23388267pjr.92.1561371049348; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 03:10:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561371049; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=A7ZcncXb9+IlCpnvYO4oTd5aoFnqHQMjavCVNPNScmqxHiJ6zLXTitvKftx+2unvsa 1bxMfYlSSc91+LbEwDv9xBtRnY3mZ+lmbx9392sAHMDxvTlBZ5R8Rd2y0wnL3R+Oxf5l B1dvepYj6USdpIfC6Swn9MwRi2ELEeVppdP9xkSoAvRcoq/H8JvnlIvXc2K902ZhJrit xF0bIFfRrgW6dNjwIRHIn1GfFROvLosoVbpVRXlQ4Tc0Rae0w1Ln3y/iDu02gvXmebpk 2fvcxMENsxk/uB1pZsnJtYmF5EGQUEtH/SezUPwLbT8jkRZ0GogDMGcIov2p4FLrQXI/ XI5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=8X6J8k6pHJ4qZcz/mtvls7ThfWBJwvs/V67O+clqRHw=; b=S1hfe1RHs4Bhf9Sn61UGk6gtofPDc8CnpwVuwlJ7tYFAzNunteo5ok1vXVxlmoiKil WJxPWMdmIIbh0wpRc3dB68oKy12XEX2vlb3sdxW/Vpvt75FyRbAzlBWGeHBcc3rKLknT 9uQKD7jTi1SZjGpHR1L8/SqkdEt9oI28m9Ycxqfntl12C5M3jHAlZf84+4GOX3xztTDH mGMumIU0yrdnRbQm0gTrnVYXj3fYZG84WGODhc92y+ujpqw7p/ho4qCjD0pl5ke1axpZ Cg67BgVOXiaQjHA/Q6NdVCqnjFBQjW64uYjr27oM5ATuoZRcb6BBKJJU0gzApcuFQrsh fSPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 64si10328824pld.334.2019.06.24.03.10.33; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 03:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730501AbfFXKJo (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:09:44 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:35542 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728434AbfFXKJg (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:09:36 -0400 Received: from p5b06daab.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.171] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hfLuj-0005CU-L6; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:09:29 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:09:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jan Kiszka cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: x86: Spurious vectors not handled robustly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan, On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Jan Kiszka wrote: > probably since "x86: Avoid building unused IRQ entry stubs" (2414e021ac8d), > the kernel can no longer tell spurious IRQs by the APIC apart from spuriously > triggered unused vectors. Err. It does. > We've managed to trigger such a cause with the Jailhouse hypervisor > (incorrectly injected MANAGED_IRQ_SHUTDOWN_VECTOR), and the result was > not only a misreport of the vector number (0xff instead of 0xef - took me > a while...), but also stalled interrupts of equal and lower priority > because a spurious interrupt is not (and must not be) acknowledged. That does not make sense. __visible void __irq_entry smp_spurious_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs) { u8 vector = ~regs->orig_ax; u32 v; entering_irq(); trace_spurious_apic_entry(vector); /* * Check if this really is a spurious interrupt and ACK it * if it is a vectored one. Just in case... */ v = apic_read(APIC_ISR + ((vector & ~0x1f) >> 1)); if (v & (1 << (vector & 0x1f))) ack_APIC_irq(); If it is a vectored one it _IS_ acked. inc_irq_stat(irq_spurious_count); /* see sw-dev-man vol 3, chapter 7.4.13.5 */ pr_info("spurious APIC interrupt through vector %02x on CPU#%d, " "should never happen.\n", vector, smp_processor_id()); and the vector through which that comes is printed correctly, unless regs->orig_ax is hosed. Thanks, tglx