Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:18:28 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
cc:     linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Huw Davies <huw@codeweavers.com>,
        Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/25] Unify vDSOs across more architectures
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906240142000.32342@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906241613280.32342@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20190621095252.32307-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906240142000.32342@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Vincenzo,

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> I did not merge the ARM and MIPS parts as they lack any form of
> acknowlegment from their maintainers. Please talk to those folks. If they
> ack/review the changes then I can pick them up and they go into 5.3 or they
> have to go in a later cycle. Nevertheless it was well worth the trouble to
> have those conversions done to confirm that the new common library fits a
> bunch of different architectures.

I talked to Russell King and he suggested to file the ARM parts into his
patch system and he'll pick them up after 5.3-rc1.

   https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/

I paged out how to deal with it, but you'll surely manage :)

Thanks,

	tglx