Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751438AbVKYKqn (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 05:46:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751442AbVKYKqm (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 05:46:42 -0500 Received: from mail22.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.160]:11140 "EHLO mail22.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751438AbVKYKqm (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 05:46:42 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: Kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:491 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:45:34 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Keith Owens , Dave Jones , Alistair John Strachan , Kenneth W , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <25093.1132876061@ocs3.ocs.com.au> <200511251050.02833.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511252145.35342.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 754 Lines: 18 On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:43, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Con Kolivas wrote: > > Would anyone object to changing it so that tainted only means Proprietary > > taint and use a different keyword for GPL tainting such as "Corrupted"? > > I don't see the point. The system is in a dubious state, tainted is > the word we've been using for that, the flags indicate what's suspect, > why play with the wording further? I was simply thinking of us confused users. No good reason otherwise. Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/