Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751457AbVKYTNy (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:13:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751458AbVKYTNy (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:13:54 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:18623 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751457AbVKYTNx (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:13:53 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rt4: via DRM errors From: Arjan van de Ven To: Lee Revell Cc: Jesse Barnes , dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <1132945536.20390.39.camel@mindpipe> References: <1132807985.1921.82.camel@mindpipe> <1132829378.3473.11.camel@mindpipe> <19379.192.138.116.230.1132836621.squirrel@192.138.116.230> <200511240731.56147.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <1132945536.20390.39.camel@mindpipe> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:13:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1132946020.8990.7.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [213.93.14.173 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [213.93.14.173 listed in combined.njabl.org] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 787 Lines: 17 On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 14:05 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 07:31 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Sounds interesting, but that would be card specific, right? I mean, > > on some cards the 2d and 3d locks would have to be the same because of > > shared state or whatever, for example. > > Not especially, that's how most Linux drivers work. The locking in the > DRM seems unusually coarse grained. of course sometimes having less but more coarse locks is actually faster. Taking/dropping a lock is not free. far from it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/