Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190221162627.3476-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <9efcbce2-4d49-7197-a3d8-0e83850892d5@web.de>
 <CAMpxmJX-wXQ-ff1RWkPmJBWSsP_v2MjZrA3fhj3HQX0_zM0eZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <39ae399a-c606-c6de-f84d-35e39d0410c0@metux.net> <CAMRc=McepqowJNi6ay6x9KKoHOC8aCxP_ob12SgbsnJU_sKQng@mail.gmail.com>
 <1dd52704-0e41-db31-33f4-c9f446a47344@metux.net> <CAMRc=Mfp85diy849r_8UHKS9eao26djrsMF0_iwE--d62mQ5jg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190625073016.GA18381@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190625073016.GA18381@kroah.com>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:32:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McPjPtDFL2m=n5fWm-fHvVbDzMopb9r=RkzS+TshMJBAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Adjust scope for CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM before devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

wt., 25 cze 2019 o 09:30 Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> napisa=C5=82(a):
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:10:25AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > pon., 24 cze 2019 o 20:22 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
> > <lkml@metux.net> napisa=C5=82(a):
> > >
> > > On 24.06.19 12:46, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > >
> > > >> The patch seems pretty trivial and doesn't change any actual code,=
 so
> > > >> I don't see hard resons for rejecting it.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > In its current form it makes the code even less readable. The #ifde=
f
> > > > should actually be one line lower and touch the comment instead of =
the
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL() related to a different function.
> > >
> > > Okay, that missing newline should be fixed (as well as the extra one
> > > after the #ifdef). Besides that, I don't see any further problems.
> > >
> >
> > Are we sure this even changes something? Does kernel documentation get
> > generated according to current config options? I really think this
> > patch just pollutes the history for now apparent reason.
> >
> > Greg, could you give your opinion on this?
>
> Why are you all arguing with a all-but-instinguishable-from-a-bot
> persona about a patch that I will never apply?
>
> greg k-h

Oh so it's another troll then? Good to know, ignoring from now on.

Thanks,
Bart