Received: by 2002:a25:f815:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u21csp3569125ybd; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:01:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz3hxhqs+p56t2EfnqnOlsZSYeus2LglxGsGA5ION6B2rwHrxXvsLHczyw1ioMHXb8IfMAT X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:62c7:: with SMTP id k7mr3583911pjs.135.1561464074294; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:01:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561464074; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lCC/f5Wke/ivoL51F/0inQfhrmNTfYhgsyLMG2mlZtA1u0iVel5ZTNrWJlf+/tCUz6 P8iYLE/IW379hNjopjOo3FwcT431tvDPg97psjnCZhGUdbzfIJM6eJ64E521oOKSg4x+ P9bop31NgJgfYCSHvO1/H05QOz/PmOrL2vvCVrSXyKP76jAPakZGNio4QQpKXGb7a0Tc DGsTlx0xQ2nh7kytv0GWj9+k6/AyC4b0t83z/RR19tV8ouVGpu6S6lq2Plln8JA7AqxZ mI5xZvUEQmfDUeLH3VzauXYc5qMHdD9ozRokan7XF5Oc+bODHfj5QzJZXgeYnk6eBZFF CEig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=3Tv0i4SjlgGOecYj0zjQAJIGxkqT9R5MmM7QObHj/Dc=; b=Kgy2ABX/pGVAa0MOMpRObpnAt4AML4BYe+qCwkPrbU+LysqpUeXmFzIN5B3TJJK1+T PjLdwqQ4vqby9JdFtRAhHEqQsqsnZl2S5KDqiHBugKg+U4KXEvIksxa/Ec+FOfXS+nf+ ENCY7sT+mtzh5jQ8ixC8u8z2PD6O1uz+2Q/prbemKSQ8OS2XpC7mxcfcVYnwFdJ+yecu G+ULmQFwhtuILy8pAvbxcJ5KasudP/2zcFMkVYzQvvIYbTBWgAngMJUaSucwR+/1Qllq 3s59lYvI/hw6CrfIzD0fTKaN+/YDM12ZFXOSdAIl2DVAu80zTBopvpWbKC1zFBftQmUJ 3/TA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k7si193985pll.145.2019.06.25.05.00.58; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731594AbfFYJcJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:32:09 -0400 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:49503 "EHLO relay1-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728768AbfFYJcG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:32:06 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 90.65.161.137 Received: from localhost (lfbn-1-1545-137.w90-65.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.65.161.137]) (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96A0224000D; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:31:56 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com Cc: peda@axentia.se, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com, Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com, wsa@the-dreams.de, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: add binding for enable-ana-filt Message-ID: <20190625093156.GF5690@piout.net> References: <1561449642-26956-1-git-send-email-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> <1561449642-26956-7-git-send-email-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> <4e81d3c9-25f3-ca6e-f2d5-17fad5905bb8@axentia.se> <84628b5e-bea7-7d91-f790-f3a2650040fa@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84628b5e-bea7-7d91-f790-f3a2650040fa@microchip.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/06/2019 09:14:13+0000, Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com wrote: > > Perhaps > > > > microchip,digital-filter; > > microchip,analog-filter; > > > > ? > > Hi Peter, > > Thanks for reviewing. The name of the property does not matter much to > me, and we have properties prefixed with vendor, and some are not. > > @Alexandre Belloni: which name you think it's best ? > I'm not sure, it depends on whether Wolfram thinks it is generic enough to be used without a vendor prefix. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com