Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190516142342.28019-1-smuchun@gmail.com> <20190524190443.GB29565@kroah.com>
 <CAPSr9jH3sowszuNtBaTM1Wdi9vW+iakYX1G3arj+2_r5r7bYwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPSr9jFG17YnQC3UZrTZjqytB5wpTMeqqqOcJ7Sf6gAr8o5Uhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190618152859.GB1912@kroah.com> <CAPSr9jFMKb1bQAbCFLqP2+fb60kcbyJ+cDspkL5FH28CNKFz3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190618161340.GA13983@kroah.com> <e3e064d85790a56b661ef9641e02c571540c6f44.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
In-Reply-To: <e3e064d85790a56b661ef9641e02c571540c6f44.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
From:   Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:06:22 +0800
Message-ID: <CAPSr9jExG2C6U0D2TN-PUxgi9waD5QkSR-icxNPP1w9nJx3GUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] driver core: Fix use-after-free and double free on
 glue directory
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org>,
        Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>, gkohli@codeaurora.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        zhaowuyun@wingtech.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> =E4=BA=8E2019=E5=B9=B46=
=E6=9C=8819=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=B8=89 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=885:51=E5=86=99=E9=
=81=93=EF=BC=9A
>
> On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 18:13 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Again, I am totally confused and do not see a patch in an email that
> > I
> > can apply...
> >
> > Someone needs to get people to agree here...
>
> I think he was hoping you would chose which solution you prefered here

Yeah, right, I am hoping you would chose which solution you prefered here.
Thanks.

> :-) His original or the one I suggested instead. I don't think there's
> anybody else with understanding of sysfs guts around to form an
> opinion.
>

Yours,
Muchun