Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (task_struct: cached_requested_key)
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
References: <20190626231617.1e858da3@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <1d868a7a-0a15-e2b1-d73b-13d9229855ad@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:01:49 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190626231617.1e858da3@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 6/26/19 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The sparc64 builds are broken in this tree, sorry.
> 
> Changes since 20190625:
> 
> 
> The keys tree gained conflicts aginst the ecryptfs and integrity trees.

Multiple build errors like this when CONFIG_KEYS is not set/enabled:
(this was seen on one i386 build)


# CONFIG_KEYS is not set
CONFIG_KEYS_REQUEST_CACHE=y


  CC      arch/x86/crypto/crc32-pclmul_glue.o
In file included from ../include/linux/export.h:45:0,
                 from ../include/linux/linkage.h:7,
                 from ../include/linux/kernel.h:8,
                 from ../arch/x86/entry/common.c:10:
../include/linux/tracehook.h: In function ?tracehook_notify_resume?:
../include/linux/tracehook.h:191:22: error: ?struct task_struct? has no member named ?cached_requested_key?
  if (unlikely(current->cached_requested_key)) {
                      ^


-- 
~Randy