Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (security/integrity/ima/)
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20190626231617.1e858da3@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <ee503bc1-a588-81f5-47e0-1762f590662f@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:35:13 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190626231617.1e858da3@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 6/26/19 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The sparc64 builds are broken in this tree, sorry.
> 
> Changes since 20190625:
> 

on x86_64:

11 warnings like this one (in a randconfig build):

  CC      security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.o
In file included from ../security/integrity/ima/ima.h:25:0,
                 from ../security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:26:
../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: ?struct key_acl? declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
           struct key_acl *acl)
                  ^
../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]


-- 
~Randy