Received: by 2002:a25:f815:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u21csp1617929ybd; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:52:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwGRnzX2E9IK3JPI3fvZmAY75VevrDl8dpqhgHcs1q1OH3re/DqZ+NSP5rJCKdDGADH2rug X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2b8a:: with SMTP id l10mr2215784plb.283.1561611131211; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:52:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561611131; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mrzs0wFnGPGnIkdKIp4tT3FYxfnczZS/dMxAie/5M08DlKvv+9tCB/TUpLlQi0ETKk Y/bqixCPl8GqD1SmPGhi5iKYza1QRA0nviqp+LaE5ehIiQodn5rtfTN9kzegX/K8LB2F vJrhIoKsvBxPaxv8aWRHCQol1i/7oit1uDnDDfb3lIKJawbaJrtPBntLxGHYu8zVWV0K 9tyY9RJDjCZ3Kgo8Kz51s50IOjZXfBremdGhTJQ5bh+eUpvZkj6JESKBVD5n0ClLUSEp xj7qjJS+Lm4hL74qGUR/e+8NUt45fB1fH+P1PM4vfZw8eL9aUW29IAtL8HqIH48do1ok fSPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=eUP/eFKJwjUa3UCYkt9GbBI2eTjlQDQ/qccSjtf9HKk=; b=jn4Nn9OyCGCXBrPqhF+F+XSFPQlUDD9fRqR2J1xt6PPJO23zP/W14Xow9PJDwdOscD BQBtc3r4RWMm7Dg4QhrbzRX88ZRYK9/vikmBN25poFQQ71beUuAFZ5HGDZKOu6V92aR9 dtpOehJ7e/dWj9yuQo/xaEEr1dsanYmHHkzdhssifGLAJtRf92wxslC5A5Qo2vj2vogc EQaS3el8+lsCYl8C0IZAywryowXl/oOtHeRMgwuBmdB/zXYmMzHZ4/MFxvZ/DZ656xjM zswEuDFFEC693kA9h1OOdTKrtCJp0yk5XplkvbteT9mAR5CO4jwrCH7/HddVeXFYjfI3 /njg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i3si1060936pgq.440.2019.06.26.21.51.31; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726980AbfF0Ev2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:51:28 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:49015 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726578AbfF0Ev2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:51:28 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 610AB68B05; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:50:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:50:52 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Brendan Higgins , Cristina Moraru , "vegard.nossum@gmail.com" , Valentin Rothberg , Hannes Reinecke , Sam Ravnborg , Michal Marek , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Tom Gundersen , Kay Sievers , Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , backports@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "rafael.j.wysocki" , Dmitry Torokhov , Takashi Iwai , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Johannes Berg , Hauke Mehrtens , Paul Bolle , Paul Gortmaker , Alexey Khoroshilov , Sathya Prakash Veerichetty , "Martin K. Petersen" , Laurence Oberman , Johannes Thumshirn , Tejun Heo , Jej B , Theodore Ts'o , Daniel Jonsson , Andrzej Wasowski Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add CONFIG symbol as module attribute Message-ID: <20190627045052.GA7594@lst.de> References: <1471462023-119645-1-git-send-email-cristina.moraru09@gmail.com> <20160818175505.GM3296@wotan.suse.de> <20160825074313.GC18622@lst.de> <20160825201919.GE3296@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 03:21:08PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:07 PM Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > In lieu of no Luke Skywalker, if you will, for a large kconfig revamp > > on this, I'm inclined to believe *at least* having some kconfig_symb > > exposed for some modules is better than nothing. Christoph are you > > totally opposed to this effort until we get a non-reverse engineered > > effort in place? It just seems like an extraordinary amount of work > > and I'm not quite sure who's volunteering to do it. > > > > Other stakeholders may benefit from at least having some config --> > > module mapping for now. Not just backports or building slimmer > > kernels. > > Christoph, *poke* Yes, I'm still totally opposed to a half-backed hack like this.