Received: by 2002:a25:f815:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u21csp2051778ybd; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxBrnePkzad0iQWclgZaa3/D76B1xUEOB2xgR7jrJqP4l96hn4/MCS13V0q45a4eyFuho3S X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e281:: with SMTP id cf1mr4403832plb.271.1561640592391; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561640592; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xRlYM/S+/KFN0fJEq7+RkyR9ap2iSJUrPUr1nt5vU1fPyILnLXbYma/yh+4xmMk7qd LiAJosxQbDyBfMg3XL2DODfv2P4X0GZzYbnL3zKJ8Rq4KdRrD4kcgvDgi06X7hkQVgwH TR7uSfOWUzmfjvfHWoPdzLjMQGVE6rvFnHjxGJx9CtnBtj0GjmzNv+LsKR1sYo+Vjdf7 NYTBYyOJGx83WP635j+CScgw5ep1bvxNcPckG8ECCCtsBDR1bK/n5Tmp1tg4r7JZOa7K wCrFrjIIIZgX4SNATKVK7+AF39n5UIHsoC2yO7Z/BKY5ZVeGt+nETuDhMaovYNL8cokl Az+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=jj8uBgpulW0jVT9NmiCDIlrNheMzzu3sUTLuj9dZfSQ=; b=sfvhw0zQInutT52N93cRyH1Ps4pXNkQPNeS0+KtbK4nm/p+Z3NXTB3ZDe1FOijjHSg 2lPsXghakzqrLvhEkPjM6NkVoEfVHUjGiC4+yLgVGo9jZX77UXjanzSsmFWJloTh+Ujj iHo52MPhDVptRgO07JkmfNvXQ5JQivY3gy7nM18Mijy4ummcLA+MS25SNKPT0XwMHufU ZWbqg/91cUkUT3DDqJnKOZrb16M33iP4ZRzzu6kTb3+zoUIGV426n5IGuJ0/nR+DCzCO nXK0kRelhB+D/wL6XFHvNugl0IhVB7kvvYeEorMYNEptF0ctk7h0uGsLXtqfT2qDp9ws PYpg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3si4991209pjt.79.2019.06.27.06.02.45; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726631AbfF0NCf (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:02:35 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:24192 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726443AbfF0NCe (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:02:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5RCx1Vw076340 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:02:33 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tcx3crwbh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:02:33 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:02:30 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:02:26 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5RD2PTH58589308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:02:25 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EF6A4064; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:02:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D16A406D; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:02:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.82.20]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:02:24 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (security/integrity/ima/) From: Mimi Zohar To: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , David Howells Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Kasatkin , linux-security-module Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:02:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20190626231617.1e858da3@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19062713-0012-0000-0000-0000032CEC7D X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19062713-0013-0000-0000-000021662A98 Message-Id: <1561640534.4101.124.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906270152 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Cc'ing David Howells] On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 11:35 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 6/26/19 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The sparc64 builds are broken in this tree, sorry. > > > > Changes since 20190625: > > > > on x86_64: > > 11 warnings like this one (in a randconfig build): > > CC security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.o > In file included from ../security/integrity/ima/ima.h:25:0, > from ../security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:26: > ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: ‘struct key_acl’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] > struct key_acl *acl) > ^ > ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default] David, CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE is dependent on KEYS being enabled, but the stub functions are not.  There's now a dependency on key_acl(). Mimi