Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic: Add dependency for ARM_GIC
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        <jason@lakedaemon.net>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
References: <1561644707-25191-1-git-send-email-xiaojiangfeng@huawei.com>
 <2934608c-9eb6-76b0-ff34-dd22bf670318@arm.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From:   Jiangfeng Xiao <xiaojiangfeng@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <a6c1662b-0713-1116-baf5-bff520d03187@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:30:37 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2934608c-9eb6-76b0-ff34-dd22bf670318@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 2019/6/27 22:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 27/06/2019 15:11, Jiangfeng Xiao wrote:
>> Not every arch has ARM_GIC, it is strange
>> to see ARM_GIC_MAX_NR in the .config file
>> of the x86 and IA-64 architecture. so fix
>> build by adding necessary dependency.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiangfeng Xiao <xiaojiangfeng@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
>> index 659c5e0..e338b471 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ config ARM_GIC_PM
>>  
>>  config ARM_GIC_MAX_NR
>>  	int
>> +	depends on ARM_GIC
>>  	default 2 if ARCH_REALVIEW
>>  	default 1
>>  
>>
> 
> Isn't that the patch[1] that has already been in -next for the past 10 
> days or so?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/commit/?h=irq/irqchip-next&id=702655234dd1d07e76f9bff9575e438c969fc32c
> 

I am very sorry. I thought that this patch was not reviewed,
so I pushed it again. I asked my colleagues how to get information
about whether the patch is included.

Will not make this low-level mistake again.

Thanks.