Received: by 2002:a25:f815:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u21csp2494847ybd; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:24:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwqyIHkolAxmc706osC+U1148xdcYgQ0caHQ2RonCcvrQCrNGekmaf3g8e/wiYuSXR/D9m5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1ae2:: with SMTP id p89mr7899933pjp.26.1561667091806; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:24:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561667091; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lAIFsBJsA2uvbN59Q3lokA9T5UhP9yZ00oXftKozoJIq164pRiGbS7kJQK9IGPUtza 3Pr8RbO+dSFt16btcjjqWqwFsSkA0/xdqeMunzZts+OxU6igi1r6M8KYTAFiCISGdf8X VLbwFGO9dXryrvxZWIQCMDzxYn5ReromdBAG/F90AqRg3SqpkqPuu8Mi2uSzi78rGSMM NQHYVQgnkfRQtBoPDBIkB4Oqs7fq+gh5EuS1t+rSqjBcW11PbBAVIDq4ESbmkZMHrmZ2 ffAV7ff+x+w92mUmuXlrCCAaxtCfBF8wSm0tZvqn9yeF56LkKiCPyN4TnzHr0yISJux7 NDmQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:from:subject:mime-version :message-id:date:dkim-signature; bh=hnna79W33XQAUXPg9/1+75Om8IQv4yeuG+2GOpSRqBk=; b=LIWZu4vhG/EqQOu8ANcxpCYIFd/4XJEnPnruXz8UBSozGVrVSfjtgt346g9EmL7BDX Xz53qQPsA6wb9ThiSmGrPS1Qmqh/iYDH91pr9L+9YsEBGfdIH2iYSbPskulYm32wI8O2 qA5HiZFLh4UzltsUce1lujYXB4aZwCv6wqHUZzFqyiC3vdto+ve3Kt5D4TuseBa8qEzE LnA90cv2537QJilUPPr6nH0uHFNyu/usLj8vRoY0qouC4BA8lPCbpMP6jriGB9He4Whn Ch4UcJG2FOAUugqur8ZA9EsemtnCWitnK6YnEsIWcsf7EI/FxaOxvBB6jlO7n9OSAiqd ZKcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="nxoAM6/0"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 89si3188198plc.88.2019.06.27.13.24.35; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="nxoAM6/0"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726539AbfF0UY3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:24:29 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-f202.google.com ([209.85.221.202]:44545 "EHLO mail-vk1-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726484AbfF0UY3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:24:29 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f202.google.com with SMTP id m1so1010765vkl.11 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:24:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=hnna79W33XQAUXPg9/1+75Om8IQv4yeuG+2GOpSRqBk=; b=nxoAM6/0hGn9NpaSYkYsfcEUMyOmigbO9cRWQGsKt89RvIm2YqeNo//qXLvo8oP3PS 044tGgQaJF6TUV2OD1DOGYhpWiVRgmNgcIieqC4IxiN7jF46Q2vEdgWcMNciwawDG/AQ qmU8RI9XseqCOqRMIO4iOtL0dAQYkRx+mkzpto6iDU6t/RtQ5oMsx7h4xDmKBIByaz2u C3lTXK7g9C1k5hrluQjotj5WqqIcZqTDZakn/6bA8HJ+1ccSkOHQBeI2DFslXr/X214I 9+Qc6yCYXZjKdDeW5LcFVq/qi3wbLHBba78weED+B0NMjwDU95y86cTEVN9MMrDEllPL oZeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=hnna79W33XQAUXPg9/1+75Om8IQv4yeuG+2GOpSRqBk=; b=n0qxUp7f08eHZNJ5K6RIGRap0bI2Ccl7kW2lxXThiODb+qDV/pvTenNPsB9UWZT/Xd VoQ1BYuUcFm5kIe8tobyEhFcgUASnf4uS9S3mQFYFrRpULzCAN8ZKV8n37H26jM99XqO 7r+q7okaPiB+qrADGvPQwEM1ul85qdvOycvIGvri8W5ayB3jx+KT+/IZmRkXO1dBXtRK 80mFKJ1j8pJohPEJOabCFDaF7z69+WGQeKX8eoqQIM6OmgaZIEANi1cLlViZijSs3h3a 6E3Ac+8Ao7pvVxRMlVQO+9Lv/Jdp0lM8EFNiFmjFL6kOaOvpLzRvell6hz7JPss0WpIL U88Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUGg26l8EGG2Pm0ekWMVi4nREzlwzBSKp5ACZXW7JMRPdGYQSu0 aFyxV9jWf+j4DCSzgUv+ejzg8oBoGkHD X-Received: by 2002:a1f:50c1:: with SMTP id e184mr2322952vkb.86.1561667067716; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:24:11 -0700 Message-Id: <20190627202417.33370-1-brianvv@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf: add BPF_MAP_DUMP command to From: Brian Vazquez To: Brian Vazquez , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , "David S . Miller" Cc: Stanislav Fomichev , Willem de Bruijn , Petar Penkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Brian Vazquez Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This introduces a new command to retrieve a variable number of entries from a bpf map. This new command can be executed from the existing BPF syscall as follows: err = bpf(BPF_MAP_DUMP, union bpf_attr *attr, u32 size) using attr->dump.map_fd, attr->dump.prev_key, attr->dump.buf, attr->dump.buf_len returns zero or negative error, and populates buf and buf_len on succees This implementation is wrapping the existing bpf methods: map_get_next_key and map_lookup_elem the results show that even with a 1-elem_size buffer, it runs ~40 faster than the current implementation, improvements of ~85% are reported when the buffer size is increased, although, after the buffer size is around 5% of the total number of entries there's no huge difference in increasing it. Tested: Tried different size buffers to handle case where the bulk is bigger, or the elements to retrieve are less than the existing ones, all runs read a map of 100K entries. Below are the results(in ns) from the different runs: buf_len_1: 55528939 entry-by-entry: 97244981 improvement 42.897887% buf_len_2: 34425779 entry-by-entry: 88863122 improvement 61.259769% buf_len_230: 11700316 entry-by-entry: 88753301 improvement 86.817036% buf_len_5000: 11615290 entry-by-entry: 88362637 improvement 86.854976% buf_len_73000: 12083976 entry-by-entry: 89956483 improvement 86.566865% buf_len_100000: 12638913 entry-by-entry: 89642303 improvement 85.900727% buf_len_234567: 11873964 entry-by-entry: 89080077 improvement 86.670461% Changelog: v2: - use proper bpf-next tag Brian Vazquez (6): bpf: add bpf_map_value_size and bp_map_copy_value helper functions bpf: add BPF_MAP_DUMP command to access more than one entry per call bpf: keep bpf.h in sync with tools/ libbpf: support BPF_MAP_DUMP command selftests/bpf: test BPF_MAP_DUMP command on a bpf hashmap selftests/bpf: add test to measure performance of BPF_MAP_DUMP include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 9 + kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++------ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 9 + tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 28 +++ tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 4 + tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 141 +++++++++++++- 7 files changed, 372 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) -- 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog