Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:22:08 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Michael Forney <mforney@mforney.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        elftoolchain-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] objtool: Rename elf_open to prevent conflict with
 libelf from elftoolchain
Message-ID: <20190628002208.v6brs6b6hf7b6sth@treble>
References: <20190616231500.8572-1-mforney@mforney.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190616231500.8572-1-mforney@mforney.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 04:14:59PM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michael Forney <mforney@mforney.org>
> ---
>  tools/objtool/check.c | 2 +-
>  tools/objtool/elf.c   | 2 +-
>  tools/objtool/elf.h   | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Sorry for the delay, I was out for a bit and I'm still trying to get
caught back up on email.

These patches look fine.  I'll try to send them on to the -tip tree
shortly.

Just curious, have you done much testing with the elftoolchain version
of libelf and objtool?  So far objtool has only been successfully used
with the elfutils version, so I'm just curious how compatible your
libelf is with the elfutils version.

-- 
Josh