Received: by 2002:a25:f815:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u21csp2967601ybd; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:11:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQAx3xD0nmY5Ni1BW+t3h7eAVSTXhpLIZsOlBz4BVroO25FanHZUMzYDR/X/DSLQ04xeKm X-Received: by 2002:a65:524b:: with SMTP id q11mr7600717pgp.384.1561705874984; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:11:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561705874; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=06cT2hCQspQKtQY2G0m8P8vsA5ZAGJph27YOAb0YUlYbMPu1l2pvo580EWur60ZIa1 4935hmUdyOZRyHgU9zkwDQNf6+bBOrtdHbmP7D1aabEYiTh8wK64sKJ36FD9LZL6Uvyp 9u9AtcQcZRN5ykawMNMOaZsg4m2xa+Sy7mYIHzSflWJss5lU4q3ZNnN9YU49DOBAFL6J zHJaJe7YQIFIwCM59ifHucBiJ6IN5nCQO/AzLZjyW3D38fGcVXzqq7qVB+B2cimUtwku jIvTPAv0PDMZtnpJgYM/Bu9gBUBPYLTMhgDeIhweSbFpPQaFdWikGH0bh80UqeLIs72d Mtsg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=OWlEgFi+9l5eCWLRLWI5CkJSk8sU1D874zUwZJ7hipM=; b=jfoaQuNJirAa/on/UYS2uskPMLAGlMwuFzPXN+kEYm75UXdThX6jpobrZdZZtbj4yF ybbOP2SZFRI7+8XkYiUBpGJW5We/y/JKz7f+YA1FSNNCHtRVGrkytt7UF290ZV5Z+Qtn kwoRqWNWUAslz8bG1Cgn0odkTP6/0XKBC9K7kYSJ03es+OGGUsCnwWLaolbm468mnGQB +D6BqIyW96JLp8xgskg4hzMRPWrc6+6fGgOPp+gdpfRmKaNnN8PTlBYoApdAPP3UykjZ xSmaLhok2tiGe+4ObldEXg/xTt2BMvAW997tb4wtw2k9Ci8tOwaNpMsyWBgXYMGjVuO+ jSEw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s12si1380047plr.338.2019.06.28.00.10.58; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727281AbfF1HKz (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:10:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57106 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726574AbfF1HKy (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:10:54 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B15B16F; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 07:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:10:49 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Waiman Long Cc: Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Jonathan Corbet , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, memcontrol: Add memcg_iterate_all() Message-ID: <20190628071049.GA2751@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20190624174219.25513-1-longman@redhat.com> <20190624174219.25513-2-longman@redhat.com> <20190627150746.GD5303@dhcp22.suse.cz> <2213070d-34c3-4f40-d780-ac371a9cbbbe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2213070d-34c3-4f40-d780-ac371a9cbbbe@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 27-06-19 17:03:06, Waiman Long wrote: > On 6/27/19 11:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 24-06-19 13:42:18, Waiman Long wrote: > >> Add a memcg_iterate_all() function for iterating all the available > >> memory cgroups and call the given callback function for each of the > >> memory cgruops. > > Why is a trivial wrapper any better than open coded usage of the > > iterator? > > Because the iterator is only defined within memcontrol.c. So an > alternative may be to put the iterator into a header file that can be > used by others. Will take a look at that. That would be preferred. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs