Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
To:     peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc:     bvanassche@acm.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, frederic@kernel.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        longman@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        boqun.feng@gmail.com, Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/30] locking/lockdep: Change return type of add_chain_cache()
Date:   Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:15:00 +0800
Message-Id: <20190628091528.17059-3-duyuyang@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190628091528.17059-1-duyuyang@gmail.com>
References: <20190628091528.17059-1-duyuyang@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

The function add_chain_cache() adds a new chain - the current lock chain
- into the lock_chains cache if it does not exist in there.

Previously if failed to add an integer 0 is returned and if successful 1
is returned. Change the return type to the pointer of the chain if the
new chain is added or NULL if otherwise.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index e30e9e4..3546894 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2714,12 +2714,12 @@ static struct lock_chain *alloc_lock_chain(void)
  * Adds a dependency chain into chain hashtable. And must be called with
  * graph_lock held.
  *
- * Return 0 if fail, and graph_lock is released.
- * Return 1 if succeed, with graph_lock held.
+ * Return NULL if failed, and graph_lock is released.
+ * Return the new chain if successful, with graph_lock held.
  */
-static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
-				  struct held_lock *hlock,
-				  u64 chain_key)
+static inline struct lock_chain *add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
+						 struct held_lock *hlock,
+						 u64 chain_key)
 {
 	struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(hlock);
 	struct hlist_head *hash_head = chainhashentry(chain_key);
@@ -2732,16 +2732,16 @@ static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
 	 * lockdep won't complain about its own locking errors.
 	 */
 	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
-		return 0;
+		return NULL;
 
 	chain = alloc_lock_chain();
 	if (!chain) {
 		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
-			return 0;
+			return NULL;
 
 		print_lockdep_off("BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS too low!");
 		dump_stack();
-		return 0;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 	chain->chain_key = chain_key;
 	chain->irq_context = hlock->irq_context;
@@ -2762,18 +2762,18 @@ static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
 		nr_chain_hlocks += chain->depth;
 	} else {
 		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
-			return 0;
+			return NULL;
 
 		print_lockdep_off("BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!");
 		dump_stack();
-		return 0;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
 	hlist_add_head_rcu(&chain->entry, hash_head);
 	debug_atomic_inc(chain_lookup_misses);
 	inc_chains();
 
-	return 1;
+	return chain;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.8.3.1