Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <201906261343.5F26328@keescook> <20190627080207.sdpwjoi4wnc664gp@mbp>
 <201906270856.8CF50064@keescook> <20190627162505.GD9894@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190627162505.GD9894@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:26:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=UhdoyWjFPxdFOJ7XFRHb62RErxFjOKnFeHtMJWTib7pg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Move jump_label_init() before parse_early_param()
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, will@kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 6:25 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> w=
rote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 08:58:03AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:02:08AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:51:15PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > This moves arm64 jump_label_init() from smp_prepare_boot_cpu() to
> > > > setup_arch(), as done already on x86, in preparation from early par=
am
> > > > usage in the init_on_alloc/free() series:
> > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1561572949.5154.81.camel@lca.pw
> > >
> > > This looks fine to me. Is there any other series to be merged soon th=
at
> > > depends on this patch (the init_on_alloc/fail one)? If not, I can que=
ue
> > > it for 5.3.
> >
> > Yes, but that series will be in 5.3 also, so there's rush for 5.2. Do
> > you want Alexander (via akpm) to include it in his series instead of it=
 going
> > through the arm64 tree?
>
> It's pretty late for 5.2, especially since it hasn't had extensive
> testing (though I'm fairly sure it won't break). Anyway, it's better if
> it goes together with Alexander's series.
Am I understanding right this is already covered by Kees having sent
his patch to -mm tree and I don't need to explicitly include it into
my series?
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>


--=20
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Stra=C3=9Fe, 33
80636 M=C3=BCnchen

Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg