Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp236597ybi; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:30:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxTEfDIgBzUBC6HcnQKCFOR9Wjef5IS4AyNSi2731OLk3NiQjXih2DlmgOqcd9ZGoivLFMX X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:3401:: with SMTP id o1mr20121196pjb.7.1561825834043; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:30:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561825834; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H/F/12ux0IYFr+wlGdI0QtmHcbCxGTJgXBxS/owWhOUgoEy013z1LnKVZAn4n5Uiuu d+/0V971un2GgO1gsSPHt7N1fr07WSkzuuT0OzgdpxWVAkQ/e1r2zGkMZoVTWCh96qFy 9ZJ4W/kdneGfxRkY2DMiKcvhTA/lPNrABxLKYcrc/93tYt39Zpd9LBuLvoiBNCJXvhub 3TI3QOKxQHB8AUVsFX4+Ev0cde/ghYUxeJ1xXvgfHq6X68SVzKpg1J2cTarprrGJqhS6 wAnFBBRMn2kDRdlpb61UWSD+TOHhR6093XrCuMvPYcS8THaforN//9tgvxqZIAM0Xba8 0nIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:cc:to:from :date; bh=4hJhxzdoviZjveqySiEAF3398FL/fJ7g9DhSBws4olk=; b=OyEYNqum9M3+PMLjrQ7M1U4lpbzNaRVt3UqEK9QsB4CHMvHuhf2+fSAW2/8S7h8nAG 6RybTKGC/pRKVryva42H5/nkGvUNvszrMM854WluiG6PmqDozrP0j3U4imEqiZbj9fIO IHMaq14pbF1ijhEar1lzXD8qSsqXycVWdPDb/beRHlkGitWoqTotRZCsGwr4ldvU9ltQ K8ZQSTmr5sFWFVGgSOlqhmMwEWjdCEq43m2PUD7qqJxqqKgrs7WMS5gUl5GwuD9q+3j0 jUc9MSX0LgXuxVIl+dEvrAIV1sRSv6lZULxXGU/euVmV7V+Tu3DzkOgWCPtnE68zimZz GfYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k3si5005002pll.343.2019.06.29.09.30.18; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726956AbfF2Q2o (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:28:44 -0400 Received: from bout01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.11.15]:49462 "EHLO bout01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726837AbfF2Q2o (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:28:44 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 517 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:28:43 EDT Received: from mx04.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.214]) by bout01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1hhGDS-0007xh-JH; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:28:42 -0600 Received: from plesk14-shared.xmission.com ([166.70.198.161] helo=plesk14.xmission.com) by mx04.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1hhGDS-0007VH-1Q; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:28:42 -0600 Received: from hacktheplanet (c-68-50-34-150.hsd1.in.comcast.net [68.50.34.150]) by plesk14.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F11619362D; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 16:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:28:35 -0400 From: Scott Bauer To: Jens Axboe Cc: jonathan.derrick@intel.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de" Message-ID: <20190629162835.GA21042@hacktheplanet> References: <1558471606-25139-1-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> <7ee5d705c12d770bf7566bce7d664bf733b25206.camel@intel.com> <20190629161947.GA20127@hacktheplanet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-XM-SPF: eid=1hhGDS-0007VH-1Q;;;mid=<20190629162835.GA21042@hacktheplanet>;;;hst=mx04.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.198.161;;;frm=sbauer@plzdonthack.me;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.198.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sbauer@plzdonthack.me X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa04.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_40, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong, XM_UncommonTLD01 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% * [score: 0.3669] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.5 XM_UncommonTLD01 Less-common TLD X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Jens Axboe X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 229 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.6 (1.1%), b_tie_ro: 1.80 (0.8%), parse: 0.82 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 2.7 (1.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.42 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.0 (1.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.27 (0.6%), tests_pri_-900: 1.02 (0.4%), tests_pri_-90: 16 (7.1%), check_bayes: 15 (6.5%), b_tokenize: 4.5 (2.0%), b_tok_get_all: 4.9 (2.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.61 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.3 (1.0%), b_finish: 0.53 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 186 (81.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.52 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 6 (2.8%), poll_dns_idle: 0.50 (0.2%), tests_pri_10: 3.2 (1.4%), tests_pri_500: 10 (4.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: sed-opal: add support for shadow MBR done flag and write X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mx04.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:26:52AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 6/29/19 10:19 AM, Scott Bauer wrote: > > > > Hey Jens, > > > > Can you please stage these for 5.3 aswell? > > Yes, looks fine to me. But it conflicts with the psid revert in terms > of ioctl numbering. You fine with me renumbering IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE to: > > #define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done) Sorry for the conflict. That's fine. I'll fix up userland tooling. > > -- > Jens Axboe >