Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp237050ybi; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:31:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzSioGlqzTuMnGdVYN57kO+hySpDUjqM+9sg9oAsbibsM2FGkPj2pB5+Sj3V6rG+KZO7V0D X-Received: by 2002:a63:db49:: with SMTP id x9mr14815086pgi.93.1561825868309; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:31:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561825868; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nlOifcKcde9edU8GE6y/QkXO0oSkqasWYv8ht8GCvZt7kLITe6MFI8bfeOiWgXx9sq foe9hi1vV+e30ZER0E60mtcoqIzQvzVcS/FgfQO9A7GyucslSLSfD3BPovYuxd1U51yb wPW4X5WClg4u5mBttrAgWsFdY7ftFtPxzmpl1pGtQvh2qqFpXHCeRvQn78bl+HbH9r5F +kaYJ8U9CQKFoc6SFq4BpGcprhjCGASKXZQCzpB9hJxajJiNEXholzsfkOkEw2Mm6vb6 MXHxRDTvRL+lYKUKMyTGFP1I4iwzR/7zFPj5ZzEdlikTI0Z1ydihovQyqGvPRISX4Ace 7BOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:cc:to:from :date; bh=/wctaQsx+/44X4H3a6qV1+p8XN26aDJThKmlKHg9IS8=; b=A+vVVjwkXN1HomGKsIJ2XsjjmZt4Z65927Yy19fMnJKjMh3ZvaEV0u4AqYu8MPShXZ 2N3buBVyerUiM00QdX6iKZLuhr4U0apv6M1k2vplwck3d0rq+cfkVCoNf9aop0kPynjx gWJ1pQRw9ySMdH7xi8R7DQiyft8c1qYciPw8YJoCKhP8/jI5PB5bWy4BZtqkIUr46Ve3 WzBh3712D9euBoKov9TI6rrjBrZKfYjvXZPBLPgg9YOmcHpdjQQoKBYYtNpKCjnT7W81 iN6JEVz5ThjIchH13Gq5DOVyh6wkkpIFgnQKsuLYQ1Kwg8i9Mz2QHYoRZf8SHK5WN09d z1BA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o39si5552009pje.28.2019.06.29.09.30.52; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726967AbfF2Q3S (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:29:18 -0400 Received: from bout01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.11.15]:49497 "EHLO bout01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726837AbfF2Q3S (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:29:18 -0400 Received: from mx01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.211]) by bout01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1hhG56-0007Mh-5o; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:20:04 -0600 Received: from plesk14-shared.xmission.com ([166.70.198.161] helo=plesk14.xmission.com) by mx01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hhG55-0001fp-KZ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:20:04 -0600 Received: from hacktheplanet (unknown [73.58.156.118]) by plesk14.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A5A7193226; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 16:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:19:55 -0400 From: Scott Bauer To: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: jonathan.derrick@intel.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de" Message-ID: <20190629161947.GA20127@hacktheplanet> References: <1558471606-25139-1-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> <7ee5d705c12d770bf7566bce7d664bf733b25206.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7ee5d705c12d770bf7566bce7d664bf733b25206.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-XM-SPF: eid=1hhG55-0001fp-KZ;;;mid=<20190629161947.GA20127@hacktheplanet>;;;hst=mx01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.198.161;;;frm=sbauer@plzdonthack.me;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.198.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sbauer@plzdonthack.me X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa02.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong, XM_UncommonTLD01 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4284] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.5 XM_UncommonTLD01 Less-common TLD X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;axboe@kernel.dk X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 405 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.1 (0.5%), b_tie_ro: 1.43 (0.4%), parse: 0.97 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (3.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.51 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 11 (2.7%), tests_pri_-950: 1.03 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 0.81 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 22 (5.5%), check_bayes: 21 (5.1%), b_tokenize: 8 (2.0%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.5%), b_comp_prob: 2.3 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.8 (0.7%), b_finish: 0.59 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 344 (85.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.45 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 152 (37.5%), poll_dns_idle: 149 (36.7%), tests_pri_10: 1.73 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 5 (1.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: sed-opal: add support for shadow MBR done flag and write X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:49:16 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mx01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey Jens, Can you please stage these for 5.3 aswell? On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 08:47:26PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote: > These are still good with me and we'll likely have a similar future use > for passing data through the ioctl. > > Could we get this staged for 5.3? > > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 22:46 +0200, David Kozub wrote: > > This patch series extends SED Opal support: it adds IOCTL for setting the shadow > > MBR done flag which can be useful for unlocking an Opal disk on boot and it adds > > IOCTL for writing to the shadow MBR. > > > > This applies on current master. > > > > I successfully tested toggling the MBR done flag and writing the shadow MBR > > using some tools I hacked together[1] with a Samsung SSD 850 EVO drive. > > > > Changes from v1: > > * PATCH 2/3: remove check with access_ok, just rely on copy_from_user as > > suggested in [2] (I tested passing data == 0 and I got the expected EFAULT) > > > > [1] https://gitlab.com/zub2/opalctl > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190501134833.GB24132@infradead.org/ > > > > Jonas Rabenstein (3): > > block: sed-opal: add ioctl for done-mark of shadow mbr > > block: sed-opal: ioctl for writing to shadow mbr > > block: sed-opal: check size of shadow mbr > > > > block/opal_proto.h | 16 ++++ > > block/sed-opal.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > include/linux/sed-opal.h | 2 + > > include/uapi/linux/sed-opal.h | 20 +++++ > > 4 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >