Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp306004ybi; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:10:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz/T4YHDHJ1NGnS/X/lmtYO+2B3JKht8dP1RhZj5uMM3xAFqs64eit2MIaMpotjCvo5+fzB X-Received: by 2002:a65:5c0a:: with SMTP id u10mr15166897pgr.410.1561831820466; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:10:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561831820; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kQ1xe3eCmznozmGkSNGl8ceKRDx7G83RetCBtXtZMdJZt9z0fcnhfbrkK8Qo7KwJFp oXHddpECe3RUSIjvpe90XlFiyb0m4xXwqhkI1D+7Da9ZbkuDWw72+84IxVQwb/Bnk9TZ LpcMg9eznDT/QW+TYVeDCu7x2sunbbsyxJcIi5C13xNcE0bsxzqnvN+o0hsIvqXqTVwY ZNAZWrd1FYmTZwxJx7AEmL9kDHUrBEAn1NZGHgWehv1O4yaSZgmkL6GnU9CCnalU68JY 6obouD97bJ/Ki2IJNRmsj/TkRKWh/DIFKzK3KGcgKn4JQDQZB74pOE3guLJcwJJX4psf OKBQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=4oOSmEw0GyCQBFo3bEX2mj0Ffp3gS+d09zLB9DsD6co=; b=X32VFZRf6bCCmgUyh1OOnwLQV+oDjaTvW6HjgDcs602KL2B8o7aSTB5Q6047NYALLA kqEwTBaKQvF85l9j8KOJ0sZUG393xnh9yIvndw32PVkS8ozVo1hU6CuOeOM8p5ifsp0J BQgpgLJMKhYB3hVkKDna8YPijU8EChMsJ4YjdayQHyjIJVr9FONFuhzgvLoUkP/XCQf5 EsaB9+P0xl7OKM0bGmwPP4KBTo1wPIMjHsg9PWNoeVMDaHcbtdI2cY2JnjNT97k+ry1+ kuWsuNRgIJ85w7ZiDE83TVFKizrMlLdzDuDuKp4XjAUvl0SG9em2pMt4HuuJTRHibuZs sLVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m12si6217542pfa.81.2019.06.29.11.10.04; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726958AbfF2SJe (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 14:09:34 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:38438 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726873AbfF2SJe (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 14:09:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::d71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EDC414B8F034; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20190629.110932.1480107082787858331.davem@davemloft.net> To: harini.katakam@xilinx.com Cc: nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, claudiu.beznea@microchip.com, rafalo@cadence.com, andrei.pistirica@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@xilinx.com, harinikatakamlinux@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Sub ns increment fixes in Macb PTP From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1561616460-32439-1-git-send-email-harini.katakam@xilinx.com> References: <1561616460-32439-1-git-send-email-harini.katakam@xilinx.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Harini Katakam Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:50:58 +0530 > The subns increment register fields are not captured correctly in the > driver. Fix the same and also increase the subns incr resolution. > > Sub ns resolution was increased to 24 bits in r1p06f2 version. To my > knowledge, this PTP driver, with its current BD time stamp > implementation, is only useful to that version or above. So, I have > increased the resolution unconditionally. Please let me know if there > is any IP versions incompatible with this - there is no register to > obtain this information from. > > Changes from RFC: > None Series applied, thanks.