Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp970516ybi; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 04:37:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzqH1r0HBul9pF6q1LZb6xglf4OlmGWerUpwj5PPRTmoYkXeWneyz6EPhQ3cK9sAElNutZr X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:36e4:: with SMTP id t91mr23766844pjb.22.1561894677995; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 04:37:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561894677; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=F4Kg+hri4owqbyhaivAPuE9t9QyKfQKu6Dl//wfjN1sleVt7QmOGUnDCm8w5K+FUdy 3nMxwNlV0yQZNlAs2kG4/ft6DeUl2W7Vk1j9nmF0rVxn3tTSE5ochyrWEFUGhrxdD628 IR/xIoGm65VMaQvfeu7+8kJzxBYkfEOouuyGrvFXEZsEBnIVFoIUClIUXaJo7qOqmEYF QvDAxdXAie31XLT1+xI/tKbWYg8JjBwH6hEEbDDP+aBhWQeb02mR7d4ydsy/HSxLxkmH bwD3z49ZSbOOlRzhmj8tXvcrQndLBqkFAQ9hMm4Tyr9krttmaaUQDEjP3wVWqFne25ch DeAw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=I5N8jGm5yeUHdZk2HPt5aNwAEcml+UOP8F8rGD1jmaI=; b=qYzsCrlQCLNEl5wuwbwa+c8WbrVzrNTp3xq71BcoKkp5azZDVAgh8aYzpOjNg/Sptk UxNrSjGjV4fm8HIC6n1mhxnK61sUPq55kljZSWbPIhuOvHMaU9b/yTjeOjPLhxmfrBbt dsn2RZprxj337ocUopWVbpwQ/3xgSr3Kuzp423k8OG/mZakI/W4eDjGUIDswW0akkk0J pMOXv8ViT/hhj71K5nGZiW+qRKg10DHlcBTZFXJtbVqXFRJJYmyWhl3Moj0kEhzmjq0d Hht3vQb0q1pQUNUNfn6Z1ei2y5US4pGOVSksGJq4+dMFLgBIaEZiXdnmJ2eNUlawS59q 2sIA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g14si7002067pgh.98.2019.06.30.04.37.16; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 04:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726531AbfF3Lfv (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 30 Jun 2019 07:35:51 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:39049 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726498AbfF3Lfu (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jun 2019 07:35:50 -0400 Received: from pd9ef1cb8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.239.28.184] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hhY7Q-0005rx-RG; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:35:41 +0200 Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:35:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Feng Tang cc: "Chen, Rong A" , "tipbuild@zytor.com" , Ingo Molnar , "lkp@01.org" , LKML , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [LKP] [x86/hotplug] e1056a25da: WARNING:at_arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:#setup_local_APIC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20190620021856.GP7221@shao2-debian> <58ea508f-dc2e-8537-fe96-49cca0a7c799@intel.com> <20190628063231.GA7766@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 29 Jun 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Feng Tang wrote: > > That function just 'works' by chance not by design. I'll stare into it and > > fix it up for real. > > > > Thank you very much for that information. Your debug was spot on! > > I rewrote that function so it actually handles that case correctly along > with some other things which were broken and force pushed the WIP.x86/ipi > branch. > > Can you please run exactly that test again against that new version and > verify that this is fixed now? Just found another issue with that thing. Don't waste your time on it. I'll come back to you when I'm done. Thanks, tglx