Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp1509113ybi; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 17:45:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw+iByYV7NHlEtQb0ywQp9UCotSKcF/0miQio7+dMzYQHlbG5Az574aM+t2Lf7L7wEOwppz X-Received: by 2002:a65:4348:: with SMTP id k8mr22029773pgq.219.1561941926416; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 17:45:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561941926; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OL0TOauRtn2g9BDfNdLJbDY+IyUvF+EjB2IhjbPrhwnhnduviGS+ZDsjNmisyQ/7Dl AVfq4a/MakosMis6uiNnsXQqvXNzZNjMmGHG2KBR3R6d7qF8agrOW9u/MvrYdOn6FaHZ VBSKXOYzlip3LlrZuRVfGmR8h3FCbb6vEejmF71kpWOQoh0ghTbfQVhaq9MZbk/KOTNR 3mqibw33ohdr/1JTRsapZ+sjwW+cQ2JRz2qnJ5QOt7RwfeYIiJTbXyE8XWG+A4gleoYi LB7uQntGMRUk4OfMQTV5m+y9sHPj5vprD3IrkW5aidVSkhXNRB4z+/O5h0MpFQxBDQEQ iXOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=wHodpI1nCBVyA0MDzStpCNwUbKmMQx3bWLNru5OLrXQ=; b=O4+Ju6WS1OBt4uf25bdC5c9b1l7K5T38um/chMdbVMSHHEXVZVwyVK7lIZ2USC+htl UZUZzrTJu6SefamSj4anpTDHikzYuWAakQSNVzV6yTYwxdpNRBLOkIqAkuu3oE+xAp+n i+hBRI/UXX2UC+gBWt9LOFs6rzgtpIfscqELUdjudmZeiXs94umpoe1nLo6gUlr+9WWX ryfwhK/7VdhMtjk6sZWbb9NibxbsRmr5/L9lDCClbUKk9aq2sHE/N+VSAbd++8Vytn2t 2eK6QubrJDbQfam308jBfYESQXaByNGuGRo7HB2A5fo/n5Yn09ZYCRFXM9HkiCoecAkY 59GQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e25si10273194pff.30.2019.06.30.17.45.11; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 17:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727268AbfGAACB (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:02:01 -0400 Received: from lgeamrelo13.lge.com ([156.147.23.53]:48319 "EHLO lgeamrelo11.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726759AbfGAACB (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:02:01 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO lgemrelse7q.lge.com) (156.147.1.151) by 156.147.23.53 with ESMTP; 1 Jul 2019 09:01:59 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.151 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Received: from unknown (HELO X58A-UD3R) (10.177.222.33) by 156.147.1.151 with ESMTP; 1 Jul 2019 09:01:59 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.33 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 09:01:14 +0900 From: Byungchul Park To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Joel Fernandes , josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: Change return type of rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread() Message-ID: <20190701000114.GB23795@X58A-UD3R> References: <1561619266-8850-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <20190627134240.GB215968@google.com> <20190627205703.GF26519@linux.ibm.com> <20190628024339.GA13650@X58A-UD3R> <20190630193834.GU26519@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190630193834.GU26519@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:38:34PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:43:39AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 01:57:03PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:42:40AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:07:46PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I tested if the WARN_ON_ONCE() is fired with my box and it was ok. > > > > > > > > Looks pretty safe to me and nice clean up! > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > > > > > Agreed, but I still cannot find where this applies. I did try rcu/next, > > > which is currently here: > > > > > > commit b989ff070574ad8b8621d866de0a8e9a65d42c80 (rcu/rcu/next, rcu/next) > > > Merge: 4289ee7d5a83 11ca7a9d541d > > > Author: Paul E. McKenney > > > Date: Mon Jun 24 09:12:39 2019 -0700 > > > > > > Merge LKMM and RCU commits > > > > > > Help? > > > > commit 204d7a60670f3f6399a4d0826667ab7863b3e429 > > > > Merge LKMM and RCU commits > > > > I made it on top of the above. And could you tell me which branch I'd > > better use when developing. I think it's been changing sometimes. > > That would be because idiot here took so much care to avoid risking > pushing some early development commits into the upcoming merge window > that he managed to misplace them entirely. The -rcu tree's "dev" branch > now includes them. Could you please port to it? Of course, I can. > a1af11a24cb0 ("rcu/nocb: Make __call_rcu_nocb_wake() safe for many callbacks") > > > Thank you for the answer in advance! > > And please accept my apologies for the very confusing tree layout this > time around! It would be totally OK if you give me the answer when I feel confused with branch for development. :) > > Thanx, Paul