Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751381AbVK2Pgv (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:36:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751378AbVK2Pgv (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:36:51 -0500 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.207]:11460 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751381AbVK2Pgv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:36:51 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Y6XVPPsybF+Q71EdKfmlmoMJrSJcijASZPk8r3qtCRb6/iDz0PhQL3EpHx2c1JQvEUEsszAaZaf3HN5bwyC376VR4mFrcQRX78FGzopeorYeP6wPq5i1W8yNYFPUoy2eVVW6nFstoq4fwrHewRUxqIbUY/Z9zDXFOOMF+QFaVg4= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:36:49 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Carlos_Mart=EDn?= To: JaniD++ Subject: Re: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs *7) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Denis Vlasenko In-Reply-To: <200511291015.55181.vda@ilport.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <018c01c5f435$9e548370$0400a8c0@dcccs> <200511291015.55181.vda@ilport.com.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2082 Lines: 55 On 29/11/05, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 18:05, JaniD++ wrote: > >References: <43892897.9020900@vc.cvut.cz> > > You abuse your reply button > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 > > No wonder... Hey, MS bashing! Can I join in? Now, wouldn't it be sacrilege to post to any technical list with something like Outlook? > > > Hi, > > > > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs > > *7) > > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs > > *7) > > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs > > *7) > > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs > > *7) > > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 > > 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled. > > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 3 > > 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled. > > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 > > 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled. > > Nov 28 16:41:36 192.168.2.50 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 3 > > 4 5 6 7 *10 11 12 14 15) > > > > This is normal? :-) > > I do not understand your question That's output from the kernel bootup-sequence, he's seen it and is asking if that is normal behavior/output. To answer the question, yes, it is perfectly normal to see that. That's just the kernel describing how the PCI IRQs are set up. You have nothing to worry about. cmn -- Carlos Mart?n Nieto http://www.cmartin.tk "?C?mo voy a decir bobadas si soy mudo?" -- CACHAI - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/