Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp2082207ybi; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 05:56:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6my5UkFg7VFKi7Tt8qqpOjHRrU+RIQdHa804oE7PgR7Hu19NkAw2UPJ2pT1kMM1k6WqBQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:37e9:: with SMTP id v96mr30397705pjb.10.1561985802203; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:56:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561985802; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gLS7hkN6OytDdJhzElDri0Ll2+BUVSZZ3Ikpa4afe/qYh6yvZs5WpeqoLwtxOWX+Bu tKK/Eu2ChqWZcE0y6LrIAsr1D3Y3Ubbgr8abePqg8wvP4cHjz7e83lNDXzZe8Hg8JFw5 8Spm4w6wR/X1aE/9KSJl+vHq2V427/1jylQHTZ26PQF03Z90QlmY+/XOszf5vnSlST9t Z0V9xCjzppqHzXhsRDHaNyxJFQjW6NoGeHnJt+aNPAitUutUBrFQA1SM2lf3hYlxWUm+ DZhKNJg4KNGNGUipHBq9Hnsbr1+yfP8XpC8dxXuIiMmo5Ttx1k4iVPMBkyoHRqbqzAG6 FRWw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=cs9JXxAvrc3tR+5gpyIFsYy70kIT6HhF7PlIR3X8A+w=; b=St3isAz0DAtkNvGo/NN4IGzC3SdsypXYYXm8uRkyJ9VyydcsLfl7ESWjF/Gck3Nznu 5YoCn7kZtvEumnOezmVylda8JkxYe3yCrqlj0HPWN8Yd1fFt9S3eo3CvZ5xTXGhSMgjL DrCx/+3nAaCt0Wiq4eYYRns0JL5rIDrTIGYVml3Jj0mlZcyVDzhjjwUFLs+IPLz0u848 5/0o9PqWkQOtzvwvppLL74zStQAhc/h8k5ij5iH2jefRKhei6yvGRq4ve6hL0j4yA12D GkHshj2r1aLsuCQbeTNe4xlVpCnGurHpyx4uT9wi56mnb4LxUSqFYFmsw4B+oC+ZN/67 UiMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i184si11538168pfb.123.2019.07.01.05.56.26; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727423AbfGAMyg (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Jul 2019 08:54:36 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:16168 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727256AbfGAMye (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jul 2019 08:54:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x61Cq3eI104227 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 08:54:33 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tfhy9jca9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 08:54:33 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 13:54:30 +0100 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 1 Jul 2019 13:54:26 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x61CsEID36503890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:54:14 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193E752051; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:54:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.110.66]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AB55204E; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:54:22 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] initramfs: read metadata from special file METADATA!!! From: Mimi Zohar To: Roberto Sassu , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, initramfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bug-cpio@gnu.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com, dmitry.kasatkin@huawei.com, takondra@cisco.com, kamensky@cisco.com, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, rob@landley.net, james.w.mcmechan@gmail.com, niveditas98@gmail.com Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 08:54:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190523121803.21638-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20190523121803.21638-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> <20190523121803.21638-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19070112-0016-0000-0000-0000028E22EC X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19070112-0017-0000-0000-000032EBAFDE Message-Id: <1561985652.4049.24.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-07-01_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907010159 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Roberto, > diff --git a/init/initramfs.c b/init/initramfs.c > index 5de396a6aac0..862c03123de8 100644 > --- a/init/initramfs.c > +++ b/init/initramfs.c > +static int __init do_process_metadata(char *buf, int len, bool last) > +{ Part of the problem in upstreaming CPIO xattr support has been the difficulty in reading and understanding the initramfs code due to a lack of comments.  At least for any new code, let's add some comments to simplify the review.  In this case, understanding "last", before reading the code, would help. Mimi > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (!metadata_buf) { > + metadata_buf_ptr = metadata_buf = kmalloc(body_len, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!metadata_buf_ptr) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto out; > + } > + > + metadata_len = body_len; > + } > + > + if (metadata_buf_ptr + len > metadata_buf + metadata_len) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto out; > + } > + > + memcpy(metadata_buf_ptr, buf, len); > + metadata_buf_ptr += len; > + > + if (last) > + do_parse_metadata(previous_name_buf); > +out: > + if (ret < 0 || last) { > + kfree(metadata_buf); > + metadata_buf = NULL; > + metadata = 0; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static int __init do_copy(void) > { > if (byte_count >= body_len) { > if (xwrite(wfd, victim, body_len) != body_len) > error("write error"); > + if (metadata) > + do_process_metadata(victim, body_len, true); > ksys_close(wfd); > do_utime(vcollected, mtime); > kfree(vcollected); > @@ -458,6 +500,8 @@ static int __init do_copy(void) > } else { > if (xwrite(wfd, victim, byte_count) != byte_count) > error("write error"); > + if (metadata) > + do_process_metadata(victim, byte_count, false); > body_len -= byte_count; > eat(byte_count); > return 1; >