Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp3712103ybi; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:10:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKeGrzrZec4Udh3CgSFMM3ilBEJ5B7ZFfTn/rXPJZvoXb1zuo4Wi8B3AbRMtOKZfht0jDq X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b591:: with SMTP id a17mr35878240pls.96.1562094608963; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:10:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1562094608; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k6sYMrE9eyblysr+nN7ol4IfeNe6SLQUUesa3yx+SvmI9OvBbcYZxFOvbpdpcRk2tf Om0ZC/cNLGfGHoARJ4czdkvZEfmZv2Xql8iHBs2ObhApLcECNJGIC1/LTNRuLr+8L8R8 i3fjMh82Ydq6Lw/w4OnYCZtEOypHOGOLIMDrA62cdkcgAgNPVZaHrTQ2zhj+3h1P5dx2 bs54Q72s8SpnXOOg8cOSMyML6/f+TGL+6mpFOwifKZpMeyNyOkHb2ttoew0AH4W6NSmR 0TaHSQl051dEK1mGxIW0A2hVpzKrDY+Q7NSPHOgitpfmQXcPTH8EWzXxEDIB8A950t6F v2SQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=7MbyDYqaqvSFQxOK+144mOVh5/lF6H2bN9YDe1mqXsE=; b=MBbZzkUCE+5jOH8pyG75MY0DXf6m0phkVSfz7olAebSDLCagkTQexlHR0PgPzZKkoG R0LbQUDKb56VcYYGN1vTMjXe+9JYiT6BxtuOkTksnQ6WkEgi/7IQ+FvE2T0ERDlSPUYC 5mGQF8r//cNRcr1OdGVPgydGm7yID9b2gEPN+GbVXY3bexQ14nq1o+Z1DDGNBsmCEsE/ TsK5VIZ/uAu8GENruTUB0qBv1uD4GHUPpNAtKq5MluLLmp8faCqm14v26ivk9BT9H9Vv +GHQaoKIaQLCa2NtllH4bQVWPm1iHGc+2qaedOpnvEC80BG+LxbrTbC43XrOxVboTzj+ GbIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gf9AynaR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l6si14075238pgl.444.2019.07.02.12.09.53; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gf9AynaR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726964AbfGBTJa (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Jul 2019 15:09:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:45408 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725851AbfGBTJa (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jul 2019 15:09:30 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id o13so3645202pgp.12 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:09:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=7MbyDYqaqvSFQxOK+144mOVh5/lF6H2bN9YDe1mqXsE=; b=gf9AynaRipCPNwL4fqUj1Kgn+M7Ben9Z5cpa9swnWQpDwgucDeCPC01FXDrDkJ6uY0 NSSCVdOhd5rccsRnUlWJ3ltnJlP3CpkB1Z4l9dmROza6n7s9SAwfvaIofJOW+IwiIL9D rzCy4GxgcbCFYjvq+xCwL1krM+FxBF9je/WbpobhrRQYa2zVlcD4/XurltNaGbLN9rvS ede+qAXNcAhTef1SGO6BUKHn/q2Nvk/NaAg2z6OGVU+ZBiu/dqAHr+Q4jibrC9xFD2D6 NHug/qhQbzlj3lSwkRlT7jw6/nXJDtW+gVpRHI/qNjTEGJuGadXUqOSUe5XpcXv/SWGi fj7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=7MbyDYqaqvSFQxOK+144mOVh5/lF6H2bN9YDe1mqXsE=; b=TQxVd2fNDxLO+yh7Do3pCDzEkk5QHpjp2X4RM3DUeR4rkrod8Mx8TQqpMlGNZaJMts nFM3pyYxExWnanePj16/HQaMip1kN5peWkG07yjcNHTywfpqExkiIUYYCNz8gRzmDwdT 5x3UDRO7xoAZJgJNJgKdLrv6myIXzUJy1+nXbGtTcXUyNhE5K+JQmWtOedTWMR9ETHAl QAvkAly0k2aEfuEEQrQ6KcEaV0dO6/h/jM5ZShX8QPDQS6J6YxvvB11/vgbMvk+Eboie xs3LcyDhjLXxXie5vASljcBQgF4mxDvH8DKGuw4/ZiGa6Vqv7i6/e1jR3iJke2qRi1tw X5OA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXqLnvT3JNcKHXZgC4mG8/T1m/G/HiaKy1bj3lxHHZO7tAmaExX //V37VrRnScnYzVfMkoX+fIpOA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:338b:: with SMTP id n11mr7294382pjb.21.1562094569110; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2620:15c:17:3:3a5:23a7:5e32:4598] ([2620:15c:17:3:3a5:23a7:5e32:4598]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y22sm29677631pfo.39.2019.07.02.12.09.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:09:27 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Waiman Long cc: Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Jonathan Corbet , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: Extend slab/shrink to shrink all the memcg caches In-Reply-To: <20190702183730.14461-1-longman@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20190702183730.14461-1-longman@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Waiman Long wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab > index 29601d93a1c2..2a3d0fc4b4ac 100644 > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab > @@ -429,10 +429,12 @@ KernelVersion: 2.6.22 > Contact: Pekka Enberg , > Christoph Lameter > Description: > - The shrink file is written when memory should be reclaimed from > - a cache. Empty partial slabs are freed and the partial list is > - sorted so the slabs with the fewest available objects are used > - first. > + A value of '1' is written to the shrink file when memory should > + be reclaimed from a cache. Empty partial slabs are freed and > + the partial list is sorted so the slabs with the fewest > + available objects are used first. When a value of '2' is > + written, all the corresponding child memory cgroup caches > + should be shrunk as well. All other values are invalid. > This should likely call out that '2' also does '1', that might not be clear enough. > What: /sys/kernel/slab/cache/slab_size > Date: May 2007 > diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h > index 3b22931bb557..a16b2c7ff4dd 100644 > --- a/mm/slab.h > +++ b/mm/slab.h > @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *); > void __kmemcg_cache_deactivate(struct kmem_cache *s); > void __kmemcg_cache_deactivate_after_rcu(struct kmem_cache *s); > void slab_kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *); > +int kmem_cache_shrink_all(struct kmem_cache *s); > > struct seq_file; > struct file; > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c > index 464faaa9fd81..493697ba1da5 100644 > --- a/mm/slab_common.c > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c > @@ -981,6 +981,49 @@ int kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *cachep) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_shrink); > > +/** > + * kmem_cache_shrink_all - shrink a cache and all its memcg children > + * @s: The root cache to shrink. > + * > + * Return: 0 if successful, -EINVAL if not a root cache > + */ > +int kmem_cache_shrink_all(struct kmem_cache *s) > +{ > + struct kmem_cache *c; > + > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM)) { > + kmem_cache_shrink(s); > + return 0; > + } > + if (!is_root_cache(s)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* > + * The caller should have a reference to the root cache and so > + * we don't need to take the slab_mutex. We have to take the > + * slab_mutex, however, to iterate the memcg caches. > + */ > + get_online_cpus(); > + get_online_mems(); > + kasan_cache_shrink(s); > + __kmem_cache_shrink(s); > + > + mutex_lock(&slab_mutex); > + for_each_memcg_cache(c, s) { > + /* > + * Don't need to shrink deactivated memcg caches. > + */ > + if (s->flags & SLAB_DEACTIVATED) > + continue; > + kasan_cache_shrink(c); > + __kmem_cache_shrink(c); > + } > + mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex); > + put_online_mems(); > + put_online_cpus(); > + return 0; > +} > + > bool slab_is_available(void) > { > return slab_state >= UP; I'm wondering how long this could take, i.e. how long we hold slab_mutex while we traverse each cache and shrink it. Acked-by: David Rientjes