Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] selftests/x86: fix spelling mistake "FAILT" ->
 "FAIL"
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
References: <20190701130431.13391-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
 <CALCETrVo0rJVxsYvo=abDfFCZHBuCiB0coSBXoDeP_emSZgESg@mail.gmail.com>
 <6e5a9bed-4f7f-4851-0421-2b440ff1f584@kernel.org>
From:   shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <9ba791d5-0d67-9834-90e9-e1dca307d386@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:25:12 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6e5a9bed-4f7f-4851-0421-2b440ff1f584@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 7/2/19 8:22 AM, shuah wrote:
> On 7/1/19 11:48 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 6:04 AM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>
>>> There is an spelling mistake in an a test error message. Fix it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>> ---
>>>   tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c 
>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
>>> index 4602326b8f5b..a4f4d4cf22c3 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
>>> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static int test_vsys_x(void)
>>>                  printf("[OK]\tExecuting the vsyscall page failed: 
>>> #PF(0x%lx)\n",
>>>                         segv_err);
>>>          } else {
>>> -               printf("[FAILT]\tExecution failed with the wrong 
>>> error: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
>>> +               printf("[FAIL]\tExecution failed with the wrong 
>>> error: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
>>>                         segv_err);
>>>                  return 1;
>>>          }
>>> -- 
>>> 2.20.1
>>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>>
> 
> Thanks Andy!
> 
> I will queue this up for 5.3
> 
> -- Shuah
> 

Hi Colin,

Checkpatch warning on this. Probably failed on the original patch.
Could you please fix the checkpatch warn, and send v2.

thanks,
-- Shuah