Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] selftests/x86: fix spelling mistake "FAILT" ->
 "FAIL"
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
References: <20190701130431.13391-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
 <CALCETrVo0rJVxsYvo=abDfFCZHBuCiB0coSBXoDeP_emSZgESg@mail.gmail.com>
 <6e5a9bed-4f7f-4851-0421-2b440ff1f584@kernel.org>
 <9ba791d5-0d67-9834-90e9-e1dca307d386@kernel.org>
 <0031e09b-e309-3976-09b1-dc8d10365aee@canonical.com>
From:   shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <aec8c4b5-a82a-74c0-f60f-869786e4a2fa@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:48:06 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0031e09b-e309-3976-09b1-dc8d10365aee@canonical.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 7/2/19 4:42 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 02/07/2019 20:25, shuah wrote:
>> On 7/2/19 8:22 AM, shuah wrote:
>>> On 7/1/19 11:48 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 6:04 AM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> There is an spelling mistake in an a test error message. Fix it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c | 2 +-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
>>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
>>>>> index 4602326b8f5b..a4f4d4cf22c3 100644
>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
>>>>> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static int test_vsys_x(void)
>>>>>                   printf("[OK]\tExecuting the vsyscall page failed:
>>>>> #PF(0x%lx)\n",
>>>>>                          segv_err);
>>>>>           } else {
>>>>> -               printf("[FAILT]\tExecution failed with the wrong
>>>>> error: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
>>>>> +               printf("[FAIL]\tExecution failed with the wrong
>>>>> error: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
>>>>>                          segv_err);
>>>>>                   return 1;
>>>>>           }
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 2.20.1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Andy!
>>>
>>> I will queue this up for 5.3
>>>
>>> -- Shuah
>>>
>>
>> Hi Colin,
>>
>> Checkpatch warning on this. Probably failed on the original patch.
>> Could you please fix the checkpatch warn, and send v2.
> 
> If I split the line, I get another checkpatch warning:
> 
> "WARNING: quoted string split across lines"
> 
> Either way checkpatch emits a warning. The convention is to not break
> literal strings, and the line is only a few chars over the 80 char
> boundary, so the V1 of the patch is the way it should be IMHO.
> 

As such this existed before your patch. I will apply v1.

thanks,
-- Shuah