Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc:     khilman@baylibre.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT v3 09/14] arm64: dts: move common G12A & G12B modes to meson-g12-common.dtsi
In-Reply-To: <e49bfb8f-23e9-c834-62c7-a40528a2ef06@baylibre.com>
References: <20190701091258.3870-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <20190701091258.3870-10-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <CAFBinCA537EV9kzz+5syaF1Q-stTJ4no+NBdcYD3QL-FJSoWfQ@mail.gmail.com> <e49bfb8f-23e9-c834-62c7-a40528a2ef06@baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:48:59 +0200
Message-ID: <1jlfxf7078.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed 03 Jul 2019 at 13:51, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:

> On 03/07/2019 01:54, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>> 
[...]
>> does it make sense to name this file "meson-g12a-g12b-sm1-common.dtsi" instead?
>> do you know whether there will be a successor to G12B and what it's
>> code-name will be?
>
> meson-g12a-g12b-sm1-common seems a bit long to me...

+1 ... and what if the generation after that is compatible as well ? We
extend the name again ? Such naming scheme does not scale.

meson-g12-common.dtsi looks good to me. IMO, The fact the sm1 dtsi includes
the file is enough to understand that sm1 derive from the g12a/b

>
> We don't have naming of the future SoCs, since SM1 is only available on
> prototypes yet.
>
> Neil
>
>> 
>> 
>> Martin
>>