Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:10:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:10:36 -0500 Received: from neodymium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.83]:17605 "EHLO neodymium.btinternet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:10:21 -0500 From: davej@suse.de Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 17:56:45 +0000 (GMT) To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Fwd: CPU detection revamp (Request for comments)] In-Reply-To: <3A0B6B43.D1210AAA@transmeta.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi hpa, First test, the AMD K6-2. Before your patch.. cpu family : 5 model : 8 stepping : 12 After.. cpu family : 5 model : 8 stepping : 4 Line 1826 of setup.c c->x86_mask = tfms & 7; Should be.. c->x86_mask = tfms & 15; I think? Also, look at the feature flags: before: flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mmx 3dnow after: features : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 pge mmx syscall 3dnow Note, I lost MTRR & sep. This may be related to the stepping bug though. I'll recompile a kernel with the &15 fix, and see if that cures all. btw, whilst all this is getting a shakedown, how about renaming that 'x86_mask' field to the more obvious 'x86_stepping' ? c->x86 would make more sense as c->x86_family too thinking about it. regards, Davej. -- | Dave Jones http://www.suse.de/~davej | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/