Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751488AbVK3SO5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:14:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751494AbVK3SO5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:14:57 -0500 Received: from baythorne.infradead.org ([81.187.2.161]:52703 "EHLO baythorne.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751488AbVK3SO4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:14:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [NET] Remove ARM dependency for dm9000 driver From: David Woodhouse To: Russell King Cc: Franck , lkml In-Reply-To: <20051130165546.GD1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20051130162327.GC1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20051130165546.GD1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:14:42 +0000 Message-Id: <1133374482.4117.91.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by baythorne.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 19 On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:55 +0000, Russell King wrote: > So until someone says "I want to use this on such and such arch" I > think it's better to keep it dependent on those we know are likely > to support it. I disagree; unless there's a reason why it _shouldn't_ work on a given architecture, it should be possible to enable it there. I believe I've seen FR-V boards with dm9000 too. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/