Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add a generic driver for LED-based backlight
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
CC:     <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>, <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        <dmurphy@ti.com>, <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
References: <20190701151423.30768-1-jjhiblot@ti.com>
 <20190705101434.fw5rpctnqt6dwg6e@devuan>
From:   Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@ti.com>
Message-ID: <e8f24c10-1d88-139c-d0ee-500473ecbe53@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jul 2019 13:34:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190705101434.fw5rpctnqt6dwg6e@devuan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 05/07/2019 12:14, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2019-07-01 17:14:19, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
>>
>> This series takes it from there and implements the binding that was
>> discussed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7293991/. In this new
>> binding the backlight device is a child of the LED controller instead of
>> being another platform device that uses a phandle to reference a LED.
> Other option would be to have backlight trigger. What are
> advantages/disadvantages relative to that?

I don't know how this would fit in the model where multiple panels are 
used, each with its own backlight.

Also the notification is only about blanking.

> 									Pavel
>