Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:20:50 -0500
Message-Id: <200512010320.jB13KoH4009443@p-chan.krl.com>
From: Don Koch <aardvark@krl.com>
To: Michael Krufky <mkrufky@m1k.net>
Cc: gene.heskett@verizon.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       kirk.lapray@gmail.com, video4linux-list@redhat.com, CityK@rogers.com,
       perrye@linuxmail.org
Subject: Re: Gene's pcHDTV 3000 analog problem
In-Reply-To: <438D38B3.2050306@m1k.net>
References: <200511282205.jASM5YUI018061@p-chan.krl.com>
	<c35b44d70511291548lcb10361ifd3a4ea0f239662d@mail.gmail.com>
	<438CFFAD.7070803@m1k.net>
	<200511300007.56004.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
	<438D38B3.2050306@m1k.net>
Organization: KRL
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2512
Lines: 87

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:29:23 -0500
Michael Krufky wrote:

> Gene Heskett wrote:
> 
> >On Tuesday 29 November 2005 20:26, Michael Krufky wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>ll I can think of doing next is to have Gene, Don or Perry do a
> >>bisection test on our cvs repo.... checking out different cvs revisions
> >>until we can narrow it down to the day the problem patch was applied.
> >>
> >>::sigh::
> >>    
> >>
> >A sigh?  More like an 'oh fudge' or whatever your fav expletive deleted
> >is...
> >
> >>Who wants to do it?  I'll give you detailed instructions if you're
> >>willing.
> >>    
> >>
> >Can you farm it out, one set of patches to each of us?  Or do you want
> >to setup a seperate cvs tree based on the v4l code in 2.6.14.3, and
> >incrementally patch it as we each report its still ok, until it breaks
> >again?  I think I'd prefer the latter so we are all near the same
> >page even if it takes 3x longer to arrive at the answer.  How many
> >actual patches in terms of dependency groups are there?  I know, I
> >coulda went all week without asking that :(
> >
> Actually, cvs has a parameter that lets you specify cutoff dates...
> 
> This is what I am suggesting that you do... Base this on my previous cvs 
> instructions....
> 
> reminder: http://linuxtv.org/v4lwiki/index.php/How_to_build_from_CVS
> 
> so....
> 
> 1st:
> 
> cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs.linuxtv.org:/cvs/video4linux login
> cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs.linuxtv.org:/cvs/video4linux co v4l-dvb
> cd v4l-dvb
> make clean
> make
> make install
> 
> test
> 
> (you already did this - you said doesnt work)
[...]
> cvs up -D 2005-10-15
> make clean
> make
> make install
> 
> doesnt work?  1 week earlier:
> 
> cvs up -D 2005-10-07
> make clean
> make
> make install

Let's put it this way: for me, 2005-10-10 doesn't work and anything earlier doesn't build.  I've tried building against 2.6.15-rc3, 2.6.14 and 2.6.13.  The card doesn't
work against the built-in 2.6.13 code, but the tuner is sending bizarre stuff
to it (channel 2 is *not* at 97.25 MHz).  2.6.14 kept spewing:

CORE IOCTL: 0xc054561d
cx88[0]: ioctl 0xc054561d (v4l2, rw, VIDIOC_G_TUNER)

all over the syslog.

Build issues include broken Makefiles (around 10-08) and missing header files.

> Cheers,
> 
> Mike
> 

-d
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/