Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp4684567ybi; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 10:41:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw7qlMB5EmwC7YN1cs6w0WLrbVg5v6eW5VeRBXA0xjRQm8mDnJ4MxoOcp51E4zVX7xlr+Zw X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b591:: with SMTP id a17mr12193686pls.96.1562434899412; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:41:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1562434899; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ocE4OFxoum6mdVgQw0ueOmEuAvcRYflsYiHD0NWAf7eoyXBdHiYSxq+24U11bldd81 VlGdss3BTWCGOyYSlBEgGLNrl3y0FkoQb57KQ0sm+mJnzW66D6Q5KRdf8SNYSODBqCL/ Ri6jaayTmLMjqm89Mqbtk/2DdFNGOuK7DZN5WTvlSFibLle4NtfNZ2MN8bhGh2NqzyfB La+b0XDuqDk83rGM9/z1WSQWnnvetm2BBtv3ayyLO0rmAUJM4kuGHUun+Qp6g3nFJ4+3 JnisedZPiijIpGxuVYgLHeow3e44ysx7vd1PZ/lWkJTFETTB5/bZHpERQgmJ8fr74ZyK FmKQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=SSgN4YIPgY78tSXl4YLNZectiEvL8u9te3T1X0J0d+g=; b=vP7RQbMHy5E+wzDSbanfpCDEAHiXZrRp380RYHxAw9ulCT9z4ybODvt744f/Ehjt4s QNWsaMx+6B6RUMMJSqpzVuy6kvafBiRAfKf+lDHi/reF4PkAcVTaWFInWAkU6kPvrrsf 9cHCsprsfCCxuAaXvApFK/6RNvk1v/6mqfpUhEy9fcg7OzsBQ1xE5bzVbqVfB2Z/wwHr VEcpX110l5psr04iEshdEIR+3elkIvdlCf+Fc00whXuCNN9izkslp7OoxpBbHke1p3EZ s6wjC8gmlqZ2OH43m49PDRM1FlZoIr/BYJu0BVmy2UR/IdD6aHFLSvXJFelUNWShvjCz 7VaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bWLacDx0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j18si13593346pfe.235.2019.07.06.10.41.24; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bWLacDx0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727071AbfGFRjv (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 6 Jul 2019 13:39:51 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:36610 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726911AbfGFRjv (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jul 2019 13:39:51 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id o9so10192893iom.3 for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:39:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SSgN4YIPgY78tSXl4YLNZectiEvL8u9te3T1X0J0d+g=; b=bWLacDx0CKYEX6MLtAR5OH24e4fV31GaSh7gFLKQNzK+O2ettmtDnvPMiNzcmYOR0U zq1mKw9kTN9T1BlRchxAyfausM8vTd9F7KLqzmSqPUKAFHYAB1PNA8VP4LdxwodSWFLk xrQDf1HbeKHFcj08f2z60hvM7F00t2gy6ztgyww77VXIGj/Rrd0x1MqOYxSN+YVVctmN uzzivzM/H0PVq1U5wbs/eRf5wfytsnUq3MAJY7slN74HV5aWvCuNsr+JR9JcQ6NDtpMm +2HzeYnw1jL1ZU7xaIPPHEMrJdMwv6SAUJV3eDlwZmka7fNIyk6a6f6WXezniHDJD/fp Y/CQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SSgN4YIPgY78tSXl4YLNZectiEvL8u9te3T1X0J0d+g=; b=M+h0dUqHHlmuUkEbVF2ivO87XlT/IZHJiWabhlhSveqo4kRxn/WgDaZU0rUhCLOh9r ZxfHdTC59X8feDyfh9FVDnLpQ2eQhpXqss9k0oKZcbCaPTsUTeBU87XeMPFoa/2QsnDy S6H+Q16IG/vllPKzAIDJLbg1VdYage0ZyqJWpyeGMFP8yzYPa1p1wjYhIUTqLc/dhi/0 EuNUvpo2e+IdW6/Jdc6cgG58Q87emmJ2z/WrVNxqbhAf1gZlJVtoYpXZ/i7Ivk5XC1p9 nqNK285sdnREqGpwMnBQNdiP0u56FzEq+onD0Kc1C4tOtS0qfbhn+J/vKW648F74/wdH HAWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVnLihUa+lel3AEw9txkyH7kNTIJDzHn+vLLD9OM6pyxZYWzyVG ka5On9gyQYOZnC3o38mP1u+heKlzorQowv9ljOhKyKav X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:1d6:: with SMTP id w22mr10269459iot.87.1562434789998; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:39:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190704084617.3602-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> <20190704084617.3602-2-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> <20190704093200.GM13424@localhost> <20190704104311.GA16681@kroah.com> <20190704121143.GA5007@kroah.com> <20190706083251.GA9249@kroah.com> <20190706171948.GA23324@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20190706171948.GA23324@kroah.com> From: Dmitry Torokhov Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 10:39:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12 v2] Platform: add a dev_groups pointer to struct platform_driver To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Johan Hovold , lkml , Richard Gong , Romain Izard , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andy Shevchenko , Mans Rullgard , Bartosz Golaszewski , Randy Dunlap Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 10:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 10:04:39AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:32 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:17:22PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 5:15 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Platform drivers like to add sysfs groups to their device, but right now > > > > > they have to do it "by hand". The driver core should handle this for > > > > > them, but there is no way to get to the bus-default attribute groups as > > > > > all platform devices are "special and unique" one-off drivers/devices. > > > > > > > > > > To combat this, add a dev_groups pointer to platform_driver which allows > > > > > a platform driver to set up a list of default attributes that will be > > > > > properly created and removed by the platform driver core when a probe() > > > > > function is successful and removed right before the device is unbound. > > > > > > > > Why is this limited to platform bus? Drivers for other buses also > > > > often want to augment list of their attributes during probe(). I'd > > > > move it to generic probe handling. > > > > > > This is not limited to the platform at all, the driver core supports > > > this for any bus type today, but it's then up to the bus-specific code > > > to pass that on to the driver core. That's usually set for the > > > bus-specific attributes that they want exposed for all devices of that > > > bus type (see the bus_groups, dev_groups, and drv_groups pointers in > > > struct bus_type). > > > > > > For the platform devices, the problem is that this is something that the > > > individual drivers want after they bind to the device. And as all > > > platform devices are "different" they can't be a "common" set of > > > attributes, so they need to be created after the device is bound to the > > > driver. > > > > I believe that your assertion that only platform devices want to > > install custom attributes is incorrect. > > Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that only platform drivers want to do > this, as you say, many other drivers do as well. > > > Drivers for devices attached > > to serio, i2c, USB, spi, etc, etc, all have additional attributes: > > > > dtor@dtor-ws:~/kernel/work (master *)$ grep -l '\(i2c\|usb\|spi\)' > > `git grep -l '\(device_add_group\|sysfs_create_group\)' -- drivers` | > > wc -l > > 170 > > > > I am pretty sure some of this count is false positives, but majority > > is actually proper hits. > > Yeah, I know, we need to add this type of functionality to those busses > as well. I don't see a way of doing it other than this bus-by-bus > conversion, do you? Can't you push the **dev_groups from platform driver down to the generic driver structure and handle them in driver_sysfs_add()? > > > > > We already emit KOBJ_BIND when we finish binding device to a driver, > > > > regardless of the bus. I know we still need to teach systemd to handle > > > > it properly, but I think it is better than sprinkling KOBJ_CHANGE > > > > around. > > > > > > But the object's attributes did just change, which is what KOBJ_CHANGE > > > tells userspace, so this should be the correct thing to say to > > > userspace. > > > > > > And yes, ideally KOBJ_BIND would be handled, and it will be sent once > > > the device's probe function succeeds, but we have to deal with old > > > userspaces as well, right? > > > > Not for the new functionality, I do not think so. Newer kernels should > > be compatible with older userspace as it not breaking it, but new > > functionality is not guaranteed to be available with older userspace. > > I agree, but again, this is a kobject change (adding attributes), so > I think the event type I picked here is the correct one. I guess once you push it all into core you'll end up with 2 uevents being emitted back-to-back and this seems inefficient. If you really want KOBJ_CHANGE maybe have some additional attribute like "CHANGE=driver-specific-attrs" in it? It's all quite ugly though. Thanks. -- Dmitry