Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190704153803.12739-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20190704153803.12739-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20190704153803.12739-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 6 Jul 2019 20:15:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb5Si0qQ71Ef10erN-pFNsK8xVpbfbztkr1-z-R+nKw8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpiolib: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 5:38 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:

> For spinlocks the type spinlock_t should be used instead of "struct
> spinlock".
>
> Use spinlock_t for spinlock's definition.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Patch applied with Bartosz' ACK!

Yours,
Linus Walleij