Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751656AbVLAIgw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 03:36:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751659AbVLAIgv (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 03:36:51 -0500 Received: from baythorne.infradead.org ([81.187.2.161]:25289 "EHLO baythorne.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751654AbVLAIgv (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 03:36:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [NET] Remove ARM dependency for dm9000 driver From: David Woodhouse To: Russell King Cc: Franck , lkml In-Reply-To: <20051130190224.GE1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20051130162327.GC1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20051130165546.GD1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1133374482.4117.91.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <20051130190224.GE1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:36:39 +0000 Message-Id: <1133426199.4117.179.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by baythorne.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 748 Lines: 21 On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 19:02 +0000, Russell King wrote: > We agree to disagree. For example, in all probability, ARM will never > see a TPM chip, yet it's offered for selection. Given that, does it > really make sense to offer it for ARM? You speak of _probability_. Yes, it makes sense to offer it as an _option_ for ARM. It just doesn't make sense to put it in the defconfig for any of the existing platforms. Nobody expects 'allyesconfig' to be something you'd actually want to _use_. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/