Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932342AbVLARk6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:40:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932364AbVLARk6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:40:58 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:9609 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932342AbVLARk5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:40:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:40:32 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: "Dugger, Donald D" cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Shah, Rajesh" , akpm@osdl.org Subject: RE: Add VT flag to cpuinfo; SSE3 flag In-Reply-To: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D372001730615842C@scsmsx402.amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D372001730615842C@scsmsx402.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 725 Lines: 20 >As I said, we discussed this internally and the concensus was that >`vmx' was correct. Especially since this term is used in the >documentation this should be safe. If not, I would propose to prefix or postfix the cpuflag somehow, maybe coupled with the arch or creator like 'ivmx' (intel vmx) and 'pvmx' (ppc vmx). Oh BTW, I am missing an 'sse3' flag in /proc/cpuinfo on Opterons (running 2.6.13). Could this be added, if it has not yet in 2.6.15rc*? Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/