Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:14:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20051201.121421.58532275.davem@davemloft.net>
To: lkml@rtr.ca
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bytecount result from printk()
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <438F1D05.5020004@rtr.ca>
References: <438F1D05.5020004@rtr.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 558
Lines: 13

From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:55:49 -0500

> Whether or not the count should even exist in the first place
> is still a question for examination -- nothing appears to use it.

I think it should be killed, in all of my Linux kernel
hacking I've never seen a user of this return value. :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/