Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:06:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:06:44 -0400 Received: from shed.alex.org.uk ([195.224.53.219]:43194 "HELO shed.alex.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:06:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 16:08:43 +0100 From: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Reply-To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel To: Alan Cox , Mikulas Patocka Cc: Rik van Riel , Krzysztof Rusocki , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Subject: Re: %u-order allocation failed Message-ID: <1231676407.1002557323@[10.132.113.67]> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --On Sunday, October 07, 2001 11:01 PM +0100 Alan Cox wrote: > vmalloc space fragments. You fragment address space rather than pages > thats all. Same problem Actually fragmented virtual space is theoretically worse, as you have now lost a possible weapon to defragment stuff (indirection on mapping to physical RAM - i.e. you could no longer move or swap out physical RAM and keep the virtual address mapping the same). -- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/