Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:17:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:16:44 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:51213 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:16:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 To: hadi@cyberus.ca (jamal) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:22:16 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik), andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli), mingo@elte.hu (Ingo Molnar), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux-Kernel), netdev@oss.sgi.com, torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) In-Reply-To: from "jamal" at Oct 08, 2001 11:09:57 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > NAPI is important - the irq disable tactic is a last resort. If the right > > hardware is irq flood aware it should only ever trigger to save us from > > irq routing errors (eg cardbus hangs) > > Agreed. As long as the IRQ flood protector can do proper isolation. > Here's hat i see on my dell latitude laptop with a built in ethernet (not > cardbus related ;->) It doesnt save you from horrible performance. NAPI is there to do that, it saves you from a dead box. You can at least rmmod the cardbus controller with protection in place (or go looking for the problem with a debugger) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/