Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:46:04 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kprobes sanity test fails on next-20190708
Message-Id: <20190710114604.8e753774a93ece9d3e753646@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190709114045.091c94f3@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20190708141136.GA3239@localhost.localdomain>
        <a19faa89-d318-fe21-9952-b0f842240ba5@arm.com>
        <CADYN=9LBQ4NYFe8BPguJmxJFMiAJ405AZNU7W6gHXLSrZOSgTA@mail.gmail.com>
        <20190709213657.1447f508bd6b72495ec225d9@gmail.com>
        <20190709112548.25edc9a7@gandalf.local.home>
        <20190709153755.GB10123@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
        <20190709114045.091c94f3@gandalf.local.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:40:45 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 16:37:55 +0100
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> > > I agree. I pushed to my repo in the for-next branch. Care to test that?
> > > 
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git  
> > 
> > I've just given that a spin with KPROBES and KPROBES_SANITY_TEST
> > selected, and it boots cleanly for me. FWIW:
> > 
> > Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Thanks, then I'm guessing no more changes need to be made.
> 
> I usually don't rebase my for-next branch for tags, but since I just
> pushed it, I guess I can add this one ;-)

Thanks Steve!


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>