Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp9483139ybi; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:04:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqziCSNwsL6yAzj3YhIvmbugL2JnLlXEOvcAUANFMY4sbxesWoPE5Hiie0MLQ5PpKwNv8S5k X-Received: by 2002:a65:62ca:: with SMTP id m10mr38357946pgv.57.1562781881185; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:04:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1562781881; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y3ED5QRui11VpPtHjmZ//ZIB6jer1isSh88Ar/R61AKscbH973mLUxKxy7K63bwhQ9 rv5khmImp7p9DAtzLnNWE2C+YTPhzqlc9XH48qh1DrOZAmxgBc/CGZHUsSsYzrogKeVp tLgV3AhvLky4LWdyBuzH2gr8Kv3gIwpCB+eSuuL7Y+9PfqCAiBGp0HIRBcIk4etKThVY 06NazKTIUDUZzOuHs5FnoAhNtgecxfPBSjECF5DQDCUvdy1qXtfn3lphAeZLUp80i9/9 aRcgjG/J5kYypajmsm1PgeKgncDU02Nr7nABpBjmeqB0jG/Yoa3mwNI/1KCqVCjxCgsd B7aQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=TxbpTbFTB6tcLStSvP+aZxI9Q0R2lb9U8jlmNMNQU/k=; b=a7S+MHJI4C+FsWAw7G/evTi1RTmGd4JyzxCdZO0uwtTC60uVxNibnFxqglwyaA0hab kEjaau31ASrUjf1vRVZxSWDn7foTdctd60O80bQHvVSUVpIQ6eymITGzI9+3JeYY5bca CwIddQoEuCC5U9BsNzwnPz0FrSVInf2UGNqcr10iGLvE2jzKNBy4ZPlDaMm4kAN1kNAK F48anhSrJyzQlXrJjfAs1kevVWISceGLSuwPTMIQ4J4LBccxDrvf67faCoa8pZEVvEEi eGo2FMMV91VoPCG3SPdIDkCPH3YVpGEyn1V7tA6SvYrSM7n1ZmpT9Ya53iDKnF8hSbY6 XIkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="U//DVdj8"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b7si2841622pfp.4.2019.07.10.11.04.25; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:04:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="U//DVdj8"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727841AbfGJRBQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:01:16 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41144 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725956AbfGJRBQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:01:16 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 324EE214AF; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:01:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1562778075; bh=TxbpTbFTB6tcLStSvP+aZxI9Q0R2lb9U8jlmNMNQU/k=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=U//DVdj8YeqqMqoEDtUVuLtXzsBFDbK43r7r+8WEjfC1VRimpCIv2wgciP4TBN/1i J5jJLff9enx6GJSi0qmcn2fHltBH8KhSQR0qMHQ+By8LbYiJ+S6vw1yXceuxXgquR4 s/H+wScP71uIDBVJapDktsBgEARQrR4kG7GwHgdk= Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id c9so2115694lfh.4; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUbiZMC6q38omAa10AuY0h6+6LlHSdDc25ibITfGMHVEIgyfHwf Qs0EIr3P3aLcQH9UpO2e7cmh69r/Jvsdh33m1F0= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4d1c:: with SMTP id r28mr14953327lfi.159.1562778073455; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:01:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190708141140.24379-1-k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com> <91f65527-3440-90fd-4096-5824fba1df78@partner.samsung.com> <631ffd68-7aab-2483-8799-2019bf3bb444@partner.samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <631ffd68-7aab-2483-8799-2019bf3bb444@partner.samsung.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:01:02 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800 To: Kamil Konieczny Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Marek Szyprowski , Chanwoo Choi , Kukjin Kim , Kyungmin Park , Mark Rutland , MyungJoo Ham , Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring , Stephen Boyd , Viresh Kumar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 15:51, Kamil Konieczny wrote: > > On 10.07.2019 12:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 12:03, Kamil Konieczny > > wrote: > >> > >> On 10.07.2019 11:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 16:12, wrote: > >>>> > >>>> From: Kamil Konieczny > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> The main purpose of this patch series is to add coupled regulators for > >>>> Exynos5422/5800 to keep constrain on voltage difference between vdd_arm > >>>> and vdd_int to be at most 300mV. In exynos-bus instead of using > >>>> regulator_set_voltage_tol() with default voltage tolerance it should be > >>>> used regulator_set_voltage_triplet() with volatege range, and this is > >>>> already present in opp/core.c code, so it can be reused. While at this, > >>>> move setting regulators into opp/core. > >>>> > >>>> This patchset was tested on Odroid XU3. > >>>> > >>>> The last patch depends on two previous. > >>> > >>> So you break the ABI... I assume that patchset maintains > >>> bisectability. However there is no explanation why ABI break is needed > >>> so this does not look good... > >> > >> Patchset is bisectable, first one is simple and do not depends on others, > >> second depends on first, last depends on first and second. > >> > >> What do you mean by breaking ABI ? > > > > I mean, that Linux kernel stops working with existing DTBs... or am I > > mistaken and there is no problem? Maybe I confused the order... > > It is not ABI break, it should work with existing DTBs Ah, thanks. My misunderstanding then. Looks good. Best regards, Krzysztof