Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932728AbVLBLbr (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:31:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751784AbVLBLbr (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:31:47 -0500 Received: from ns.dynamicweb.hu ([195.228.155.139]:64953 "EHLO dynamicweb.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750996AbVLBLbq (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:31:46 -0500 Message-ID: <011401c5f733$46a3cd60$0400a8c0@dcccs> From: "JaniD++" To: "Marc Koschewski" Cc: , References: <016c01c5f6cc$0e28e6d0$0400a8c0@dcccs> <1133481721.9597.37.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <00f801c5f72e$df2e58c0$0400a8c0@dcccs> <20051202110805.GA7224@stiffy.osknowledge.org> Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc3: adduser: unable to lock password file Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:26:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1367 Lines: 45 Hi, > > OK, i will try it, if i can.... (this is a productive online system, maybe > > next reboot) > > I'd rather suggest to _not_ run -rc kernels on productive systems. :) Thanks for the warning! :-) I know it, already. But have no choice. :( The older kernels didnt know what i have needed! :-/ eg: i try the 2.6.15-rc3 because 2.6.14.2 gives me this messages: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at net/core/stream.c (279) KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at net/ipv4/af_inet.c (148) nfs: server 192.168.2.100 not responding, still trying nfs: server 192.168.2.100 not responding, still trying nfs: server 192.168.2.100 not responding, still trying nfs: server 192.168.2.100 not responding, still trying nfs: server 192.168.2.100 not responding, still trying NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex nfs: server 192.168.2.100 OK nfs: server 192.168.2.100 OK nfs: server 192.168.2.100 OK nfs: server 192.168.2.100 OK nfs: server 192.168.2.100 OK So, i really did not see different! :-D Cheers, Janos > > Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/