Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp10398065ybi; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 04:42:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwSs7kANy891gwNpO2lQSyAUWBGC2yEQWFDKefMuYg+hMQovjshDAOp3XxZE/Udnr9af+CY X-Received: by 2002:a63:6507:: with SMTP id z7mr3813581pgb.186.1562845351317; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 04:42:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1562845351; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y1Zz1ikpJEmcJnlAQgKXTQZr+TDcXzLHYHEhe8ttbFZ0+A2Ha3HMERDeM1hbzZbejv kqGhvCRdz9K3n26+yP9vv54rfK/AxaZzBenJ1NCli9wWHZ1/tpMt1fj9ekb4S+b8yR4D 442bgrrB3cszbSK4ht1p9JEr3EwXf48QJ82ACtPTFlt/bLGxgB4S/IS0ZWCDhRtgaZal fxYJ4zRt0eT5sUHl18FcmpOdwtHXeUszbDxFhJYh/wByuCtkMfFT9syyoHbzkW0Prm2u z3YkeO4EjNAkWo/8XE4ok3IQ5XPNNkCuRjhGIjNJBOBwtWJQGpxQcpxte2ZTbBsk98BC tYJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=nRXSvH7xIIcGxyuyt/g5VG2ze73FKXfT7TjPaunE5Mo=; b=Wq4wWYOUdqBEg6pQQhckCZNhBzSJbpX0dDRL59beFQ3QsU9MZY8g/hX9JuocXT2HaU 7Q+6+Oj+oz+2cd3xNVjknp1xpE/3QrGj+QxnJ8YRy9132Uje5fGsvkwbo8HWyFszhCVH yrDDTbBlk8hVRCMQ47+Ca34TESkWLlpMw1D7WQgLsTliOqGyXOx7tzv7ic4STOYNnKLw oRq3TEDEkk2/SJrP2u4H+bcKuNTCxDXwpXGve16k0EesHllRZg8k4c/i2K8Ugdwu0QyU 20qrL6hdnujFqrCrD1ucFxFxifEbtUY8AbFwVGAWPpTjfjA9doSp8Pyu6OKFNkIMyIbe ZBAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t16si5210842pfh.100.2019.07.11.04.42.14; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 04:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728421AbfGKLkL (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 07:40:11 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com ([209.85.210.66]:45166 "EHLO mail-ot1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728026AbfGKLkK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 07:40:10 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id x21so5471447otq.12; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nRXSvH7xIIcGxyuyt/g5VG2ze73FKXfT7TjPaunE5Mo=; b=sGggdJMQsx5qlgo2rhFRkWpk57rUQW3Y9ooreSu0TtuI8Tz/3c2wfk3j3ERjgZjAkB mUExkOtnRRBc+pILIcW3BYtxq7tdlUVPQUyY56MHMtI9iC+JQlsxPOkVSckCovWbeFNW W73wKGHUAVBkr/pklPO83sOSpfJg7nKxdWLlvALiFJtZ4dBQyP5Yf5rSlFfoR3+J1NX6 GgauEdsrqhKAqzQ2Qeo3i+rwpqB/SkoBf3IRi55Ftu/X+tOwrr177HG2VRA1N5VXq7Ob pQwcp5DwIlI83en1BzVHvfVrwNvNM68p1nUl5sGJ5c76/T4xHfezJWI9Kuc1ZksqcHvt fE0g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUw+Qyue+hdhKn/LZESeCcL2lvcZMH0mNq01k9sA2lkah7or6qc TexMbqao29QM6PMrdo3SghpznC1jqGYIG1+B9l0= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6959:: with SMTP id p25mr2825092oto.118.1562845208468; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 04:40:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3121545.4lOhFoIcdQ@kreacher> In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:39:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Remove device link creation limitation To: Saravana Kannan Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Linux PM , Lukas Wunner , Jon Hunter , Ulf Hansson , Marek Szyprowski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:06 AM Saravana Kannan wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:19 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > If device_link_add() is called for a consumer/supplier pair with an > > existing device link between them and the existing link's type is > > not in agreement with the flags passed to that function by its > > caller, NULL will be returned. That is seriously inconvenient, > > because it forces the callers of device_link_add() to worry about > > what others may or may not do even if that is not relevant to them > > for any other reasons. > > > > It turns out, however, that this limitation can be made go away > > relatively easily. > > > > The underlying observation is that if DL_FLAG_STATELESS has been > > passed to device_link_add() in flags for the given consumer/supplier > > pair at least once, calling either device_link_del() or > > device_link_remove() to release the link returned by it should work, > > but there are no other requirements associated with that flag. In > > turn, if at least one of the callers of device_link_add() for the > > given consumer/supplier pair has not passed DL_FLAG_STATELESS to it > > in flags, the driver core should track the status of the link and act > > on it as appropriate (ie. the link should be treated as "managed"). > > This means that DL_FLAG_STATELESS needs to be set for managed device > > links and it should be valid to call device_link_del() or > > device_link_remove() to drop references to them in certain > > sutiations. > > > > To allow that to happen, introduce a new (internal) device link flag > > called DL_FLAG_MANAGED and make device_link_add() set it automatically > > whenever DL_FLAG_STATELESS is not passed to it. Also make it take > > additional references to existing device links that were previously > > stateless (that is, with DL_FLAG_STATELESS set and DL_FLAG_MANAGED > > unset) and will need to be managed going forward and initialize > > their status (which has been DL_STATE_NONE so far). > > > > Accordingly, when a managed device link is dropped automatically > > by the driver core, make it clear DL_FLAG_MANAGED, reset the link's > > status back to DL_STATE_NONE and drop the reference to it associated > > with DL_FLAG_MANAGED instead of just deleting it right away (to > > allow it to stay around in case it still needs to be released > > explicitly by someone). > > > > With that, since setting DL_FLAG_STATELESS doesn't mean that the > > device link in question is not managed any more, replace all of the > > status-tracking checks against DL_FLAG_STATELESS with analogous > > checks against DL_FLAG_MANAGED and update the documentation to > > reflect these changes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > --- > > Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst | 4 > > drivers/base/core.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++-------------- > > drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 4 > > include/linux/device.h | 4 > > 4 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) > > > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/core.c > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c > > @@ -124,6 +124,50 @@ static int device_is_dependent(struct de > > return ret; > > } > > > > +static void device_link_init_status(struct device_link *link, > > + struct device *consumer, > > + struct device *supplier) > > +{ > > + switch (supplier->links.status) { > > + case DL_DEV_PROBING: > > + switch (consumer->links.status) { > > + case DL_DEV_PROBING: > > + /* > > + * A consumer driver can create a link to a supplier > > + * that has not completed its probing yet as long as it > > + * knows that the supplier is already functional (for > > + * example, it has just acquired some resources from the > > + * supplier). > > + */ > > + link->status = DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE; > > + break; > > + default: > > + link->status = DL_STATE_DORMANT; > > + break; > > + } > > + break; > > + case DL_DEV_DRIVER_BOUND: > > + switch (consumer->links.status) { > > + case DL_DEV_PROBING: > > + link->status = DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE; > > + break; > > + case DL_DEV_DRIVER_BOUND: > > + link->status = DL_STATE_ACTIVE; > > + break; > > + default: > > + link->status = DL_STATE_AVAILABLE; > > + break; > > + } > > + break; > > + case DL_DEV_UNBINDING: > > + link->status = DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND; > > + break; > > + default: > > + link->status = DL_STATE_DORMANT; > > + break; > > + } > > +} > > + > > static int device_reorder_to_tail(struct device *dev, void *not_used) > > { > > struct device_link *link; > > @@ -179,9 +223,9 @@ void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct devic > > * of the link. If DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME is not set, DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE will be > > * ignored. > > * > > - * If DL_FLAG_STATELESS is set in @flags, the link is not going to be managed by > > - * the driver core and, in particular, the caller of this function is expected > > - * to drop the reference to the link acquired by it directly. > > + * If DL_FLAG_STATELESS is set in @flags, the caller of this function is > > + * expected to release the link returned by it directly with the help of either > > + * device_link_del() or device_link_remove(). > > * > > * If that flag is not set, however, the caller of this function is handing the > > * management of the link over to the driver core entirely and its return value > > @@ -201,9 +245,16 @@ void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct devic > > * be used to request the driver core to automaticall probe for a consmer > > * driver after successfully binding a driver to the supplier device. > > * > > - * The combination of DL_FLAG_STATELESS and either DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER > > - * or DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER set in @flags at the same time is invalid and > > - * will cause NULL to be returned upfront. > > + * The combination of DL_FLAG_STATELESS and one of DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER, > > + * DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER, or DL_FLAG_AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER set in @flags at > > + * the same time is invalid and will cause NULL to be returned upfront. > > + * However, if a device link between the given @consumer and @supplier pair > > + * exists already when this function is called for them, the existing link will > > + * be returned regardless of its current type and status (the link's flags may > > + * be modified then). The caller of this function is then expected to treat > > + * the link as though it has just been created, so (in particular) if > > + * DL_FLAG_STATELESS was passed in @flags, the link needs to be released > > + * explicitly when not needed any more (as stated above). > > * > > * A side effect of the link creation is re-ordering of dpm_list and the > > * devices_kset list by moving the consumer device and all devices depending > > @@ -223,7 +274,8 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(stru > > (flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS && > > flags & (DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER | > > DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER | > > - DL_FLAG_AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER)) || > > + DL_FLAG_AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER | > > + DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) || > > (flags & DL_FLAG_AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER && > > flags & (DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER | > > DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER))) > > If DL_FLAG_MANAGED is meant to be an internal flag (as in caller > shouldn't use it), maybe it'll be better to just check for it in flags > and reject it? Because looks like you are setting it anyway if > STATELESS isn't set. Well, to be honest, I was kind of divided here, because passing MANAGED if STATELESS is not passed is technically not a bug and returning NULL in that case seemed a bit awkward to me. That said, the function doesn't reject flags with unused bits set anyway and arguably it should, so I'll add that check and that'll cover MANAGED too. > > > @@ -236,6 +288,9 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(stru > > } > > } > > > > + if (!(flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS)) > > + flags |= DL_FLAG_MANAGED; > > + > > device_links_write_lock(); > > device_pm_lock(); > > > > @@ -262,15 +317,6 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(stru > > if (link->consumer != consumer) > > continue; > > > > - /* > > - * Don't return a stateless link if the caller wants a stateful > > - * one and vice versa. > > - */ > > - if (WARN_ON((flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) != (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS))) { > > - link = NULL; > > - goto out; > > - } > > - > > if (flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME) { > > if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)) { > > pm_runtime_new_link(consumer); > > @@ -281,6 +327,7 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(stru > > } > > > > if (flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) { > > + link->flags |= DL_FLAG_STATELESS; > > kref_get(&link->kref); > > goto out; > > } > > @@ -299,6 +346,11 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(stru > > link->flags &= ~(DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER | > > DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER); > > } > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) { > > + kref_get(&link->kref); > > + link->flags |= DL_FLAG_MANAGED; > > + device_link_init_status(link, consumer, supplier); > > + } > > goto out; > > } > > > > @@ -325,48 +377,10 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(stru > > kref_init(&link->kref); > > > > /* Determine the initial link state. */ > > - if (flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) { > > + if (flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > link->status = DL_STATE_NONE; > > - } else { > > - switch (supplier->links.status) { > > - case DL_DEV_PROBING: > > - switch (consumer->links.status) { > > - case DL_DEV_PROBING: > > - /* > > - * A consumer driver can create a link to a > > - * supplier that has not completed its probing > > - * yet as long as it knows that the supplier is > > - * already functional (for example, it has just > > - * acquired some resources from the supplier). > > - */ > > - link->status = DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE; > > - break; > > - default: > > - link->status = DL_STATE_DORMANT; > > - break; > > - } > > - break; > > - case DL_DEV_DRIVER_BOUND: > > - switch (consumer->links.status) { > > - case DL_DEV_PROBING: > > - link->status = DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE; > > - break; > > - case DL_DEV_DRIVER_BOUND: > > - link->status = DL_STATE_ACTIVE; > > - break; > > - default: > > - link->status = DL_STATE_AVAILABLE; > > - break; > > - } > > - break; > > - case DL_DEV_UNBINDING: > > - link->status = DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND; > > - break; > > - default: > > - link->status = DL_STATE_DORMANT; > > - break; > > - } > > - } > > + else > > + device_link_init_status(link, consumer, supplier); > > > > /* > > * Some callers expect the link creation during consumer driver probe to > > @@ -528,7 +542,7 @@ static void device_links_missing_supplie > > * mark the link as "consumer probe in progress" to make the supplier removal > > * wait for us to complete (or bad things may happen). > > * > > - * Links with the DL_FLAG_STATELESS flag set are ignored. > > + * Links with the DL_FLAG_MANAGED flag unset are ignored. > > */ > > Nitpick. It might be easier to read if you removed the double > negative. So something like: > Links without the DL_FLAG_MANAGED flag set are ignored. Fair enough. > > int device_links_check_suppliers(struct device *dev) > > { > > @@ -538,7 +552,7 @@ int device_links_check_suppliers(struct > > device_links_write_lock(); > > > > list_for_each_entry(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node) { > > - if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) > > continue; > > > > if (link->status != DL_STATE_AVAILABLE) { > > @@ -563,7 +577,7 @@ int device_links_check_suppliers(struct > > * > > * Also change the status of @dev's links to suppliers to "active". > > * > > - * Links with the DL_FLAG_STATELESS flag set are ignored. > > + * Links with the DL_FLAG_MANAGED flag unset are ignored. > > */ > > void device_links_driver_bound(struct device *dev) > > { > > @@ -572,7 +586,7 @@ void device_links_driver_bound(struct de > > device_links_write_lock(); > > > > list_for_each_entry(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node) { > > - if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) > > continue; > > > > /* > > @@ -593,7 +607,7 @@ void device_links_driver_bound(struct de > > } > > > > list_for_each_entry(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node) { > > - if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) > > continue; > > > > WARN_ON(link->status != DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE); > > @@ -605,6 +619,13 @@ void device_links_driver_bound(struct de > > device_links_write_unlock(); > > } > > > > +static void device_link_drop_managed(struct device_link *link) > > +{ > > + link->flags &= ~DL_FLAG_MANAGED; > > + WRITE_ONCE(link->status, DL_STATE_NONE); > > + kref_put(&link->kref, __device_link_del); > > +} > > + > > /** > > * __device_links_no_driver - Update links of a device without a driver. > > * @dev: Device without a drvier. > > @@ -615,18 +636,18 @@ void device_links_driver_bound(struct de > > * unless they already are in the "supplier unbind in progress" state in which > > * case they need not be updated. > > * > > - * Links with the DL_FLAG_STATELESS flag set are ignored. > > + * Links with the DL_FLAG_MANAGED flag unset are ignored. > > */ > > static void __device_links_no_driver(struct device *dev) > > { > > struct device_link *link, *ln; > > > > list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(link, ln, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node) { > > - if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) > > continue; > > > > if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER) > > - __device_link_del(&link->kref); > > + device_link_drop_managed(link); > > else if (link->status == DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE || > > link->status == DL_STATE_ACTIVE) > > WRITE_ONCE(link->status, DL_STATE_AVAILABLE); > > @@ -643,7 +664,7 @@ static void __device_links_no_driver(str > > * %__device_links_no_driver() to update links to suppliers for it as > > * appropriate. > > * > > - * Links with the DL_FLAG_STATELESS flag set are ignored. > > + * Links with the DL_FLAG_MANAGED flag unset are ignored. > > */ > > void device_links_no_driver(struct device *dev) > > { > > @@ -652,7 +673,7 @@ void device_links_no_driver(struct devic > > device_links_write_lock(); > > > > list_for_each_entry(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node) { > > - if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) > > continue; > > > > /* > > @@ -680,7 +701,7 @@ void device_links_no_driver(struct devic > > * invoke %__device_links_no_driver() to update links to suppliers for it as > > * appropriate. > > * > > - * Links with the DL_FLAG_STATELESS flag set are ignored. > > + * Links with the DL_FLAG_MANAGED flag unset are ignored. > > */ > > void device_links_driver_cleanup(struct device *dev) > > { > > @@ -689,7 +710,7 @@ void device_links_driver_cleanup(struct > > device_links_write_lock(); > > > > list_for_each_entry_safe(link, ln, &dev->links.consumers, s_node) { > > - if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) > > continue; > > > > WARN_ON(link->flags & DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER); > > @@ -702,7 +723,7 @@ void device_links_driver_cleanup(struct > > */ > > if (link->status == DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND && > > link->flags & DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER) > > - __device_link_del(&link->kref); > > + device_link_drop_managed(link); > > > > WRITE_ONCE(link->status, DL_STATE_DORMANT); > > } > > @@ -724,7 +745,7 @@ void device_links_driver_cleanup(struct > > * > > * Return 'false' if there are no probing or active consumers. > > * > > - * Links with the DL_FLAG_STATELESS flag set are ignored. > > + * Links with the DL_FLAG_MANAGED flag unset are ignored. > > */ > > bool device_links_busy(struct device *dev) > > { > > @@ -734,7 +755,7 @@ bool device_links_busy(struct device *de > > device_links_write_lock(); > > > > list_for_each_entry(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node) { > > - if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) > > continue; > > > > if (link->status == DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE > > @@ -764,7 +785,7 @@ bool device_links_busy(struct device *de > > * driver to unbind and start over (the consumer will not re-probe as we have > > * changed the state of the link already). > > * > > - * Links with the DL_FLAG_STATELESS flag set are ignored. > > + * Links with the DL_FLAG_MANAGED flag unset are ignored. > > */ > > void device_links_unbind_consumers(struct device *dev) > > { > > @@ -776,7 +797,7 @@ void device_links_unbind_consumers(struc > > list_for_each_entry(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node) { > > enum device_link_state status; > > > > - if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) > > continue; > > > > status = link->status; > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c > > @@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ void pm_runtime_remove(struct device *de > > * runtime PM references to the device, drop the usage counter of the device > > * (as many times as needed). > > * > > - * Links with the DL_FLAG_STATELESS flag set are ignored. > > + * Links with the DL_FLAG_MANAGED flag unset are ignored. > > * > > * Since the device is guaranteed to be runtime-active at the point this is > > * called, nothing else needs to be done here. > > @@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ void pm_runtime_clean_up_links(struct de > > idx = device_links_read_lock(); > > > > list_for_each_entry_rcu(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node) { > > - if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) > > + if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_MANAGED)) > > continue; > > > > while (refcount_dec_not_one(&link->rpm_active)) > > Index: linux-pm/include/linux/device.h > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/device.h > > +++ linux-pm/include/linux/device.h > > @@ -829,12 +829,13 @@ enum device_link_state { > > /* > > * Device link flags. > > * > > - * STATELESS: The core won't track the presence of supplier/consumer drivers. > > + * STATELESS: The core will not remove this link automatically. > > * AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER: Remove the link automatically on consumer driver unbind. > > * PM_RUNTIME: If set, the runtime PM framework will use this link. > > * RPM_ACTIVE: Run pm_runtime_get_sync() on the supplier during link creation. > > * AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER: Remove the link automatically on supplier driver unbind. > > * AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER: Probe consumer driver automatically after supplier binds. > > + * MANAGED: The core tracks presence of supplier/consumer drivers (internal). > > */ > > #define DL_FLAG_STATELESS BIT(0) > > #define DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER BIT(1) > > @@ -842,6 +843,7 @@ enum device_link_state { > > #define DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE BIT(3) > > #define DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER BIT(4) > > #define DL_FLAG_AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER BIT(5) > > +#define DL_FLAG_MANAGED BIT(6) > > > > /** > > * struct device_link - Device link representation. > > Index: linux-pm/Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst > > +++ linux-pm/Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst > > @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ typically deleted in its ``->remove`` ca > > driver is compiled as a module, the device link is added on module load and > > orderly deleted on unload. The same restrictions that apply to device link > > addition (e.g. exclusion of a parallel suspend/resume transition) apply equally > > -to deletion. Device links with ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` unset (i.e. managed > > -device links) are deleted automatically by the driver core. > > +to deletion. Device links managed by the driver core are deleted automatically > > +by it. > > > > Several flags may be specified on device link addition, two of which > > have already been mentioned above: ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` to express that no > > > > Other than those 2 minor comments, this looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan Thanks!