Received: by 2002:a25:ad19:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y25csp10448245ybi; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 05:31:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw7DSypVRvKzeLJHk2jcWpkTqnYkyMBQBWf4ytSqWINyZoOwnR6fKPJ05C8EQhv174hmODA X-Received: by 2002:a63:6c7:: with SMTP id 190mr4142234pgg.7.1562848314528; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 05:31:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1562848314; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CDT5CbbVLA4DLUFO3+Ecsl7Idgu7tvqaMsC4cCDjfcyDyRuKRla6LJoHdux7Tzh8la 2LmKa3k0EXD+R3cTNt/7OlTh/99b2LD5+d9EY+/sjZDB86/dbf8ShhFVYYvNtxA0zGXa rQeNZM42/A9iet0F22Wd5HAOX4svxQ2aGETdOJ76zYPbSECoADRCu84PqckVyj++cduE YdSUko/AxM2//jTQxIaddJglSgwJbA/ZfPUDlKaYMtXgddpiQh153dtms+wElLmxwS8c oOW+pWpR2miwjJuG1Bzz4AtqGkden2md7MKBUmJkzdXpLh6PWOtZq9/Ft1p0Ro7Okkgk /8PQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:references:importance:sensitivity :mime-version:date:cc:to:from:in-reply-to; bh=0h4QwzPgqtuWJ9iLH2MpAkhHlU4JW5dje0cUPqbJU/E=; b=eV/Q1gBOoDrofYasn1bz8UetjHY/tEMUkLx95bsvUFcu5dy0b2LbBbO8PAgXe7KE3n AL/r7GmhvJkrl5WNr0HwrX7AGEBmeTI4cEL8VBG2J00nCiKODla3eIeTBRy7CpjYZ6XG c5WgO3rz4sxlfDkUetpnX7O3+CXhVLInNFd5yj9RRkPS7dw0f+C+xa2UXT9G6H7gwuW3 yOLuLOsjUTLULnwn7GLSoaWVjnL+BF+4XGAP3HUGwWIzUHraJduB2c/K0bZM0O1hbbLc QwF907sTwhGToDdeQaSBx2NXvFczrWA3iYwfMvg94X5EEkhi+4g8KZPiEYLByUQKufYd CwLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i5si4871223pgq.412.2019.07.11.05.31.38; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 05:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728624AbfGKM3c convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:29:32 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:49096 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728497AbfGKM3c (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:29:32 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x6BCSnrS007321 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:29:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com [192.155.248.67]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tp4r1saar-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:29:30 -0400 Received: from localhost by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:29:29 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp07.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.146.103.14) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.16) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:29:22 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail162.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com ([10.146.71.4]) by us1a3-smtp07.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2019071112292189-411667 ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:29:21 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20190711115235.GA25821@mellanox.com> From: "Bernard Metzler" To: "Jason Gunthorpe" Cc: "Leon Romanovsky" , "Stephen Rothwell" , "Doug Ledford" , "David Miller" , "Networking" , "Linux Next Mailing List" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:29:21 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sensitivity: Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <20190711115235.GA25821@mellanox.com>,<20190710175212.GM2887@mellanox.com> <20190709135636.4d36e19f@canb.auug.org.au> <20190709064346.GF7034@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> X-Mailer: IBM iNotes ($HaikuForm 1054) | IBM Domino Build SCN1812108_20180501T0841_FP55 May 22, 2019 at 11:09 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 20971 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 x-cbid: 19071112-0327-0000-0000-00000BE240E3 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: BY=0; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.40962; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC=; MB=0.000001 X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011408; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01230620; UDB=6.00648208; IPR=6.01011897; BA=6.00006355; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00027678; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-07-11 12:29:27 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unsuspicious REMOTE=unsuspicious XFE=unused X-IBM-AV-VERSION: SAVI=2019-07-11 09:18:22 - 6.00010151 x-cbparentid: 19071112-0328-0000-0000-00001750473C Message-Id: Subject: Re: Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-07-11_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----"Jason Gunthorpe" wrote: ----- >To: "Bernard Metzler" >From: "Jason Gunthorpe" >Date: 07/11/2019 01:53PM >Cc: "Leon Romanovsky" , "Stephen Rothwell" >, "Doug Ledford" , "David >Miller" , "Networking" , >"Linux Next Mailing List" , "Linux Kernel >Mailing List" >Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of >the net-next tree > >On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 08:00:49AM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote: > >> That listen will not sleep. The socket is just marked >> listening. > >Eh? siw_listen_address() calls siw_cep_alloc() which does: > > struct siw_cep *cep = kzalloc(sizeof(*cep), GFP_KERNEL); > >Which is sleeping. Many other cases too. > >Jason > > Ah, true! I was after really deep sleeps like user level socket accept() calls ;) So you are correct of course. Thanks! Bernard