Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 11 Jul 2019 15:41:59 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regmap: Add DSI bus support
Message-ID: <20190711144159.GH14859@sirena.co.uk>
References: <20190703214326.41269-1-jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
 <20190703214512.41319-1-jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
 <20190706010604.GG20625@sirena.org.uk>
 <CAOCk7No77CDRE=bnBVGzYw9ixWKO4PMBBWksm4JEeh3ydfOk+g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOCk7No77CDRE=bnBVGzYw9ixWKO4PMBBWksm4JEeh3ydfOk+g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 12:08:34PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 7:06 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> The addresses for these spec defined messages are 8-bit wide, so 256
> valid "destinations".  However, the payload is variable.  Most of the
> defined operations take an 8-bit payload, but there are a few that I
> see with 16-bit payloads.

Oh, good, variable register sizes, what a market leading idea :(
That basically doesn't work with regmap, you need to either
define one regmap per register size and attach them to the device
or use reg_read() and reg_write() and hide the complexity in
there.

> As the contents of the generic read/write messages are implementation
> defined, the answer to your question seems to be no - the spec does
> not define that the registers are 8-bit addressable, and 8-bit wide.

The code definitely ought to at least be more flexible then.
Right now it's very hard coded.

> I think perhaps the discussion needs to step back a bit, and decide
> how flexible do we want this regmap over DSI to be?  I think its
> usefulness comes from when a device can be configured via multiple
> interfaces, so I don't expect it to be useful for every DSI interface.
> It seems like the DSI panels use DSI directly to craft their
> configuration.  As a result, we are probably looking at just devices
> which use the generic read/write commands, but sadly the format for
> those is not universal per the spec.  From the implementations I've
> seen, I suspect 8-bit addressing of 8-bit wide registers to be the
> most common, but apparently there is an exception to that already in
> the one device that I care about.

It's relatively easy to add a bunch of special cases in - look at
how the I2C code handles it, keying off a combination of the
register configuration and the capabilities of the host
controller.  I guess for this it'd mainly be the register
configuration.  You might find the reg_read()/reg_write()
interface better than the raw buffer one for some of the formats,
it does let=20

> Do we want to go forward with this regmap support just for the one TI
> device, and see what other usecases come out of it, and attempt to
> solve those as we go?

I have no strong opinions here, it looks fine from a framework
point of view though it's unclear to me if viewing it as a
register map meshes well with how the hardware is designed or not
- it seems plausible though.

--aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl0nSrQACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9Dqygf/XOpd88JPRHZWBN+yYZ3UHJfhBe6xy8/HfJBBT8sXXA2L3k7rHpRMmhKk
RC58a6kuy8mDm+tQhIgEwHUlFotAHGk8kn0yNQuVK0XNL4zvAqdcQHV+gsn//x6G
R3PQrLboonlT69lWDNW4dI1zc78mY6FzKQRtFa7kmIYZ5hr/WwtR9TfpReeUxLCr
P5FYi4QzBp3uloWecgLExYmFZj3IHznUWpp8Hm11JDXyrpVShOMJCiA99q/W9N6A
ALxrijQlTenDH7gMw7YEaDhnl+osCa392CguDJiSNbDW7usZ+5WGOF7TGOLu8F+u
udGDeMVl9eOc7g2CHoRTEg6/WtQv/A==
=1lgs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c--