Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:56:46 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        dave.hansen@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com,
        serge.ayoun@intel.com, shay.katz-zamir@intel.com,
        haitao.huang@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, kai.svahn@intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, luto@kernel.org, kai.huang@intel.com,
        rientjes@google.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 22/28] x86/traps: Attempt to fixup exceptions in vDSO
 before signaling
Message-ID: <20190711155645.GD15067@linux.intel.com>
References: <20190417103938.7762-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20190417103938.7762-23-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20190625154341.GA7046@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190625154341.GA7046@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 06:43:41PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Is there any obvious reason why #PF fixup is in its own patch and the
> rest are collected to the same patch? I would not find it confusing if
> there was one patch per exception but really don't get this division.

I split them due to SGX's funky #PF behavior with respect to th EPCM.
I'm ok with them being squashed.