Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750964AbVLBTR2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:17:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750971AbVLBTR2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:17:28 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.207]:29717 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750963AbVLBTR1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:17:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=GKPD9QtM55Z9aFWFgRUIoXK4YtqNXFj0U3Um13B4dIEc/lHpB2NynlJp323bYloXEntjRERBMvqQ8qcopF32fwBNSPtoEKE1dggnmY6WdVBRehmIhIeh5+bYjdr9TX1wQNltpuYeHu8TKogHPi8ERxAadhn5+NzahtTJGxvxC54= Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] linux-2.6-block: deactivating pagecache for benchmarks From: Badari Pulavarty To: Andrew Morton Cc: Dirk Henning Gerdes , axboe@suse.de, lkml In-Reply-To: <20051201172520.7095e524.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1133443051.6110.32.camel@noti> <20051201172520.7095e524.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 11:17:31 -0800 Message-Id: <1133551051.21429.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1351 Lines: 44 On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 17:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Dirk Henning Gerdes wrote: > > > > For doing benchmarks on the I/O-Schedulers, I thought it would be very > > useful to disable the pagecache. > > That's an FAQ. Something like this? > > > From: Andrew Morton > > Add /proc/sys/vm/drop-pagecache. When written to, this will cause the kernel > to discard as much pagecache and reclaimable slab objects as it can. > > It won't drop dirty data, so the user should run `sync' first. > > Caveats: > > a) Holds inode_lock for exorbitant amounts of time. > > b) Needs to be taught about NUMA nodes: propagate these all the way through > so the discarding can be controlled on a per-node basis. > > c) The pagecache shrinking and slab shrinking should probably have separate > controls. > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Yep. This is what I wanted also :) This is similar functionality as "cfree" module some one wrote a while ago. Cool, This will make some of the database folks get off my back for a while :) Thanks, Badari - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/