Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751000AbVLBTvM (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:51:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750999AbVLBTvM (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:51:12 -0500 Received: from dsl081-060-252.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.60.252]:50825 "EHLO vitelus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987AbVLBTvL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:51:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:51:09 -0800 From: Aaron Lehmann To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Promise SATA oops Message-ID: <20051202195109.GE3677@vitelus.com> References: <20051202045853.GD3677@vitelus.com> <438FDB9D.2030201@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <438FDB9D.2030201@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 691 Lines: 15 On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:29:01AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > This should be fixed in 2.6.15-rcX... Still isn't stable. It froze within hours after announcing in all terminals that it was disabling a certain IRQ. Now the RAID is so degraded that root can't even be mounted. Was the Promise controller a bad choice for a reliable setup? I may not have time to look at this further until late next week, but I'll follow up with whatever I learn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/