Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:01:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:01:51 -0400 Received: from [192.132.92.2] ([192.132.92.2]:14253 "EHLO bitmover.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:01:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 09:02:03 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [OT] testing internet performance, esp latency/drops? Message-ID: <20011008090203.L26223@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Merry kernel hackers, we recently installed a T1 line at bitmover.com and expected improved performance. In some places we got it, pings to places in the silicon valley are a respectable 5-9 milliseconds. FTP performance is a predictable 180KB/sec, as expected. However, web browsing sucks. On about 80% of all links, there is a noticable hesitation, between 1-15 seconds, as it looks up the name and as it fetches the first page. After that point, that site will appear to be OK. It sounds to me like return packets are getting dropped a lot. Which is possible, but I'd like to know for sure. Before I wander off to write a test for this, I'm wondering if anyone knows of a test suite or a methodology which works. I was thinking about just coding every reference in bookmarks/history into a driver file which drove a connect-o-matic program that timed how fast it could connect to each of those sites. Any comments on that idea? -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/